#m-labs on 2018-04-20 — irc logs at freenode.irclog.whitequark.org

2015-03-04 14:45 sb0 changed the topic of #m-labs to: ARTIQ, Migen, MiSoC, Mixxeo & other M-Labs projects :: fka #milkymist :: Logs http://irclog.whitequark.org/m-labs

00:07 Guest68864 has joined #m-labs

00:24 <GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] whitequark commented on issue #919: @gkasprow I used to get the expected output from DACs before, so it's not your fault, it's something else. https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/919#issuecomment-382922846

03:13 rohitksingh_work has joined #m-labs

03:33 <GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] sbourdeauducq commented on issue #967: No errors on the HKG board... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/967#issuecomment-382962512

03:34 <GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] sbourdeauducq commented on issue #967: No errors on the HKG board... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/967#issuecomment-382962512

05:00 ncl has quit [Remote host closed the connection]

05:03 ncl has joined #m-labs

05:04 mumptai has joined #m-labs

06:16 <GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] enjoy-digital commented on issue #967: @jbqubit, @sbourdeauducq: thanks for testing. ... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/967#issuecomment-382990678

06:39 FabM_cave has joined #m-labs

07:19 mumptai has quit [Quit: Verlassend]

10:38 stekern has joined #m-labs

11:09 <GitHub169> smoltcp/master 7b91126 Dan Robertson: Add Repr support for NDISC packets...

11:09 <GitHub169> [smoltcp] whitequark pushed 1 new commit to master: https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/commit/7b911267efcfb6683effa6e58c02e626d398d958

11:09 <GitHub93> [smoltcp] whitequark closed pull request #191: Add Repr support for NDISC packets (master...ndisc) https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/191

11:09 <GitHub89> [smoltcp] whitequark commented on issue #191: Thanks! This is very nice. https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/191#issuecomment-383063722

11:20 <travis-ci> m-labs/smoltcp#873 (master - 7b91126 : Dan Robertson): The build passed.

11:20 <travis-ci> Change view : https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/compare/f0cad1df08ae...7b911267efcf

11:20 <travis-ci> Build details : https://travis-ci.org/m-labs/smoltcp/builds/369082559

11:21 hartytp has joined #m-labs

11:21 <GitHub105> [smoltcp] whitequark commented on pull request #178 0eb0467: We need to decide what to do here with storage that isn't empty. Do we clear it? Or do we allow bootstrapping an interface already joined to multicast groups? I'm leaning to the latter because it lets you do things like saving state across reboots, if you want.... https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/178#discussion_r180949324

11:22 <hartytp> rjo: any updates on when you think the SU-servo will be ready for testing?

11:31 <sb0> by the way, have you seen this device > http://sevensols.com/index.php/products/white-rabbit-switch/

11:31 <sb0> that could be used as a drtio master with a lot of lower-latency satellite devices

11:32 <sb0> I have some pictures of the inside, it's a large transceiver breakout board with a FPGA module plugged into it

11:33 <sb0> the module it comes with could run artiq already (kintex-7, sdram, ethernet)

11:40 FabM_cave is now known as FabM

12:09 rohitksingh_work has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]

12:15 <GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] jbqubit commented on issue #967: > Joe do those bad mem test eyes go away when you unplug the RTM?... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/967#issuecomment-383077208

12:21 <GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] whitequark closed issue #974: String comparisons by value using != on core https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/974

12:23 <GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] sbourdeauducq pushed 1 new commit to release-3: https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/commit/d11f66291c19157bf5262c53ca6533a668722dbf

12:23 <GitHub-m-labs> artiq/release-3 d11f662 whitequark: compiler: desugar x != y into not x == y (fixes #974).

12:26 <rjo> hartytp: not yet.

12:30 hartytp has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]

12:45 rohitksingh has joined #m-labs

12:59 <bb-m-labs> build #1435 of artiq-board is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq-board/builds/1435

13:09 <bb-m-labs> build #840 of artiq-win64-test is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq-win64-test/builds/840

13:18 <rjo> hartytp: i expect to see some progress next week. then i can tell you more.

13:21 <bb-m-labs> build #2263 of artiq is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq/builds/2263

13:57 <bb-m-labs> build #1436 of artiq-board is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq-board/builds/1436

14:26 FabM has quit [Quit: ChatZilla 0.9.93 [Firefox 52.7.3/20180326230345]]

14:38 rohitksingh has quit [Quit: Leaving.]

15:22 <sb0> rjo, I'm checking if we can drop DDS batch mode

15:23 <sb0> it doesn't seem to be used, and it's a source of complexity + ad9914 vs. urukul inconsistency

15:23 <sb0> code that isn't there cannot make spaghetti

15:24 <whitequark> mmm, spaghetti

15:25 <sb0> though, it is nice when used with the phase modes (which we don't have for urukul yet)

15:25 <sb0> hmm

15:27 <GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] whitequark pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/compare/b4e3c30d8c26...742e27344119

15:27 <GitHub-m-labs> artiq/master 742e273 whitequark: Commit missing part of b4e3c30d.

15:27 <GitHub-m-labs> artiq/master 0d5fd1e whitequark: runtime: fix race condition in log extraction code paths (#979)....

15:29 <GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] whitequark commented on issue #979: The panics won't happen anymore. Investigating the slowdown. https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/979#issuecomment-383133085

15:29 hartytp has joined #m-labs

15:29 <hartytp> rjo: cool, thanks

15:29 <hartytp> let me know how it goes

15:30 <whitequark> sb0: do we have measurement tape in office?

15:30 <hartytp> that's the last thing I want to test before placing an Urukul/Sampler order with Creotech

15:31 <sb0> whitequark, maybe

15:32 <sb0> that would be in the toolbox or in the big black drawers next to the argon bottle

15:33 hartytp has quit [Client Quit]

15:34 <whitequark> nope

15:40 <sb0> whitequark, can you fix release-3 as well?

16:18 <sb0> also batch mode as it is now is a PITA to implement if dds channels are scattered around, e.g. in a drtio system

16:19 mumptai has joined #m-labs

16:21 <sb0> maybe just exposing ref_time to the user and implementing batches explicitly in the experiments is a better solution

16:26 <GitHub126> [smoltcp] dlrobertson opened pull request #194: NDISC: Improve the representation layer for NDISC (master...ipv6) https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/194

16:33 <GitHub155> [smoltcp] whitequark commented on issue #194: @m-labs-homu r+... https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/194#issuecomment-383152025

16:33 <GitHub32> [smoltcp] m-labs-homu commented on issue #194: :pushpin: Commit ac37833 has been approved by `whitequark`

16:34 <GitHub106> [smoltcp] m-labs-homu pushed 1 new commit to auto: https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/commit/cc15985ba4c02153b4491c18e063ef6e76367340

16:34 <GitHub106> smoltcp/auto cc15985 Dan Robertson: NDISC: Improve the representation layer for NDISC...

16:34 <GitHub163> [smoltcp] m-labs-homu commented on issue #194: :hourglass: Testing commit ac3783392c4648f22bec564c9b4b0cd5ffc66c1d with merge cc15985ba4c02153b4491c18e063ef6e76367340... https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/194#issuecomment-383152100

16:36 <GitHub144> [smoltcp] dlrobertson opened issue #195: Use new_checked by default https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/issues/195

16:37 <GitHub185> [smoltcp] dlrobertson commented on issue #195: Just a question/thought https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/issues/195#issuecomment-383152917

16:43 <travis-ci> m-labs/smoltcp#875 (auto - cc15985 : Dan Robertson): The build passed.

16:43 <travis-ci> Change view : https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/compare/4aeeac09d564...cc15985ba4c0

16:43 <travis-ci> Build details : https://travis-ci.org/m-labs/smoltcp/builds/369214823

16:43 <GitHub108> [smoltcp] m-labs-homu commented on issue #194: :sunny: Test successful - [status-travis](https://travis-ci.org/m-labs/smoltcp/builds/369214823?utm_source=github_status&utm_medium=notification)

16:43 <GitHub159> [smoltcp] m-labs-homu merged auto into master: https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/compare/7b911267efcf...cc15985ba4c0

16:43 <GitHub151> [smoltcp] m-labs-homu closed pull request #194: NDISC: Improve the representation layer for NDISC (master...ipv6) https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/194

16:52 <travis-ci> m-labs/smoltcp#876 (master - cc15985 : Dan Robertson): The build passed.

16:52 <travis-ci> Change view : https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/compare/7b911267efcf...cc15985ba4c0

16:52 <travis-ci> Build details : https://travis-ci.org/m-labs/smoltcp/builds/369218376

16:59 <GitHub114> [smoltcp] whitequark commented on issue #195: There is nothing inherently safer about constructing packets with `new_checked` because you can still get panics if you modify a length field inside the packet and then use an accessor.... https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/issues/195#issuecomment-383158774

17:55 <bb-m-labs> build #841 of artiq-win64-test is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq-win64-test/builds/841

17:59 <bb-m-labs> build #2264 of artiq is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq/builds/2264

18:35 <bb-m-labs> build #1437 of artiq-board is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq-board/builds/1437

18:39 <bb-m-labs> build #2265 of artiq is complete: Failure [failed python_unittest_2] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq/builds/2265 blamelist: whitequark <whitequark@whitequark.org>

23:17 X-Scale has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]

23:19 X-Scale has joined #m-labs