sb0 changed the topic of #m-labs to: ARTIQ, Migen, MiSoC, Mixxeo & other M-Labs projects :: fka #milkymist :: Logs http://irclog.whitequark.org/m-labs
ncl has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds]
ncl has joined #m-labs
rohitksingh_work has joined #m-labs
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] hartytp commented on issue #854: @gkasprow How did you get on with this? Any progress? https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/854#issuecomment-383512222
rohitksingh_work has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
rohitksingh_work has joined #m-labs
rohitksingh_work has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
rohitksingh_work has joined #m-labs
rohitksingh_work has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] jordens opened issue #986: corelog chokes coredevice https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/986
rohitksingh has joined #m-labs
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] whitequark commented on issue #986: > Experiments submitted through artiq_master and artiq_run are also different. On artiq_master the RPCs take ~5ms while on artiq_run they are around 2.5ms... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/986#issuecomment-383571301
rohitksingh has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
rohitksingh has joined #m-labs
rohitksingh has quit [Client Quit]
rohitksingh has joined #m-labs
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] sbourdeauducq opened issue #987: compiler crash when function type annotation is present https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/987
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] whitequark commented on issue #987: Well, the actual problem here is that your type annotation is nonsensical. ARTIQ Python only accepts type annotations from `artiq.compiler.types`. https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/987#issuecomment-383600485
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] sbourdeauducq commented on issue #987: That should be documented; at the minimum the error message should point that out. https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/987#issuecomment-383601617
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] whitequark commented on issue #987: > at the minimum the error message should point that out... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/987#issuecomment-383602798
rohitksingh has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
rohitksingh has joined #m-labs
rohitksingh has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
rohitksingh has joined #m-labs
futarisIRCcloud has joined #m-labs
<rjo> sb0: https://hastebin.com/emobanamuv.pas did you check whether that can be ignored?
samhile has joined #m-labs
samhile has quit [Client Quit]
rohitksingh has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
mumptai has joined #m-labs
<rjo> sb0: the fact that "internal" rtio clock is not 125 MHz anymore should be mentioned in the manual.
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] jordens pushed 8 new commits to master: https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/compare/4fe09fddd501...4903eb074c02
<GitHub-m-labs> artiq/master d5eea96 Robert Jordens: suservo: fix cnv_b diff
<GitHub-m-labs> artiq/master c8fd637 Robert Jordens: suservo: add unittests...
<GitHub-m-labs> artiq/master 934c41b Robert Jordens: gateware: add suservo...
<bb-m-labs> build #2270 of artiq is complete: Failure [failed python_unittest] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq/builds/2270 blamelist: Robert Jordens <jordens@gmail.com>
futarisIRCcloud has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity]
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] jordens commented on issue #986: And poll time plus schedule time plus two ctx switches are 400k cycles? Or is that the scheduler tick? https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/986#issuecomment-383683621
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] whitequark commented on issue #986: The scheduler is cooperative so it doesn't have ticks. It switches to the next thread once the current one blocks on something. https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/986#issuecomment-383685678
<GitHub14> [smoltcp] astro commented on pull request #187 8c4e2ec: Because this is just preparing the buffer. Anyway, fixed it. https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/187#discussion_r183533222
<GitHub99> [smoltcp] whitequark commented on pull request #187 8c4e2ec: This is not any better... https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/187#discussion_r183533591
<whitequark> sb0: why is migen's namer so bad?
<whitequark> it's just adding sequential numbers at the end, which makes the names completely useless
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] jordens pushed 1 new commit to master: https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/commit/f74998a5e043ac9efb26989c44068627c24528cd
<GitHub-m-labs> artiq/master f74998a Robert Jordens: suservo: move arch logic to top, fix tests
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] gkasprow commented on issue #854: I prepared simple design that simply forwards RGMII data to the IO header. It is really strange why I see really nice RGMII signals on FPGA vias but the Microscope tool does not detect any traffic.... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/854#issuecomment-383732738
<bb-m-labs> build #1442 of artiq-board is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq-board/builds/1442
<bb-m-labs> build #2271 of artiq is complete: Failure [failed python_unittest_2] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq/builds/2271 blamelist: Robert Jordens <jordens@gmail.com>
mumptai has quit [Quit: Verlassend]
<GitHub154> [smoltcp] barskern commented on issue #104: I would like to take a stab at implementing this feature. I have been programming in Rust for some months now, and I've taken a subject in University about networks and protocols. I've started to read through the code, but I was wondering if I could get a helping indication on where to start. https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/issues/104#issuecomment-383748658
<GitHub108> [smoltcp] whitequark commented on issue #104: There's a comment that says `// FIXME: implement fast retransmit`, that would be a good start :) https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/issues/104#issuecomment-383749137
X-Scale has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
<GitHub121> [smoltcp] astro commented on pull request #187 8c4e2ec: Why touch the internal `tx_buffer` you ask? The `read_at` pointer must be initialized so that the check still makes sense when the optimization is merged. https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/187#discussion_r183569336