sb0 changed the topic of #m-labs to: ARTIQ, Migen, MiSoC, Mixxeo & other M-Labs projects :: fka #milkymist :: Logs http://irclog.whitequark.org/m-labs
rohitksingh has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
rohitksingh has joined #m-labs
rohitksingh has quit [Client Quit]
rohitksingh has joined #m-labs
rohitksingh has quit [Client Quit]
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] sbourdeauducq commented on issue #967: You should be able to go to 500Mbps, and keep the same clocks, by putting the SERDES into 4:1 mode.... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/967#issuecomment-381377998
<GitHub-m-labs> [artiq] sbourdeauducq commented on issue #967: Though, the maximum range of IDELAY varies between 1.28ns and 7.68ns with PVT (not a typo, welcome to Ultrascale). So, anything below ~780Mbps has to deal with the IDELAY range being maxed out, otherwise we will stay in the above-mentioned bug hell. Maybe the OSERDES can be in 4:1 and the ISERDES in 1:8 and you switch to the other set of outputs when the IDELAY max
rohitksingh has joined #m-labs
rohitksingh has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
rohitksingh has joined #m-labs
rohitksingh has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
ncl has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds]
Gurty has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
Gurty has joined #m-labs
Gurty has quit [Changing host]
Gurty has joined #m-labs
[X-Scale] has joined #m-labs
X-Scale has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
[X-Scale] is now known as X-Scale
rohitksingh has joined #m-labs
kuldeep has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
sandeepkr has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]
kuldeep has joined #m-labs
sandeepkr has joined #m-labs
sandeepkr has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]
kuldeep has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
kuldeep has joined #m-labs
sandeepkr has joined #m-labs
<GitHub-m-labs> [picam] jordens pushed 7 new commits to master: https://github.com/quartiq/picam/compare/e9c6dffba95f...84b1e0b46d01
<GitHub-m-labs> picam/master c2b75dc Robert Jordens: acquisition context manager
<GitHub-m-labs> picam/master fdce745 Robert Jordens: polling acquisition, cleanup, refactor
<GitHub-m-labs> picam/master 9adc561 Robert Jordens: save frames in test
stekern has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds]
stekern has joined #m-labs
<sb0> hartytp, why is a sensor like this LEM IT-400S better than a current sense resistor for measuring current through coils?
<sb0> there are usable (and low-cost) resistors, e.g. https://www.mouser.hk/datasheet/2/427/wslp3921-536393.pdf
ncl has joined #m-labs
Ultrasauce has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
sandeepkr has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
kuldeep has quit [Ping timeout: 263 seconds]
sandeepkr has joined #m-labs
kuldeep has joined #m-labs
hartytp has joined #m-labs
<hartytp> sb0: fundamentally there is nothing wrong with that approach, and it can be the best solution
<hartytp> depends on what your problem is, in terms of BW, current you need to measure, target noise etc
<hartytp> the flux-gate sensors are nice because you don't have to put the current you're trying to measure onto your PCB, which can be non-trivial for currents above 100A
<hartytp> they are also often the easiest way of getting low noise at higher currents
<hartytp> e.g. for a 10W resistor and 100A you're limited to 0.1V max sense voltage
<hartytp> in practice, one ends up being a factor of a few less than that for a variety of reasons (not wanting to run the resistor exactly at its max power, leaving some headroom in the design in case one finds on needs a bit more current later on, not being able to buy a resistor value that's perfectly matched to the target current)
<hartytp> so, you're generally only measuring 10s of mV in practice
<hartytp> in a 10Hz BW the LEM sensors have 0.05ppm RMS noise (an we found that they generally exceed their specification)
<hartytp> even for 1kHz it's only 1ppm
<hartytp> so, say you have a 50mV signal, 1ppm is equivalent to 50nV
<hartytp> IIRC the best OpAmps have a 1/f noise floor (10Hz) around 100nV
<hartytp> but, let's ignore that
<hartytp> 30nV/sqrt(1kHz) =1nV/rtHz
<hartytp> which is about the noise floor of the best OpAmp you can buy
<hartytp> add some Johnson/current noise and your circuit is a few times that
<hartytp> now, if your current is lower, the resistors can be great. Or, if you are price sensitive and don't absolutely need those last few factors of two then again they can be the best solution
<hartytp> to get the best noise out of the flux-gate sensors we generally put a few turns of wire around them
<hartytp> they are basically zero-crossing sensors so the noise floor for the different sensors is proportional to their max current
<hartytp> IIRC the biggest sensor is the 400A sensor, so we try to run as close to 400A-turns as possible. IIRC from doing the maths carefully , for any current above about 50A the flux-gate sensor tend to out perform a resistor
hartytp has quit [Quit: Page closed]
mumptai has joined #m-labs
rohitksingh has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
[X-Scale] has joined #m-labs
X-Scale has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
[X-Scale] is now known as X-Scale
<GitHub-m-labs> [picam] jordens pushed 4 new commits to master: https://github.com/quartiq/picam/compare/84b1e0b46d01...7d125e79afcc
<GitHub-m-labs> picam/master 4665553 Robert Jordens: setup.py
<GitHub-m-labs> picam/master c769134 Robert Jordens: documentation stubs
<GitHub-m-labs> picam/master 138eb60 Robert Jordens: refactor into module
mumptai has quit [Remote host closed the connection]