00:40 <DocScrutinizer51> ~ping

00:40 <infobot> ~pong

00:41 <DocScrutinizer51> ~literal ping

00:41 <infobot> "ping" is "<reply>~pong||<reply> 1 packet transmitted, 1 packet received, 0.0% packet loss"

00:41 <DocScrutinizer51> ~factinfo ping

00:41 <infobot> ping -- created by triclops <~triclops@203-219-160-62-nsw.tpgi.com.au> at Mon Oct 20 01:05:24 2003 (4257 days); last modified at Wed Jun 3 15:58:55 2015 by Torhal!Torhal@2600:3c00::f03c:91ff:fedb:9160; it has been requested 2268 times, last by DocScrutinizer51, 1m 14s ago.

02:09 <wpwrak> grmbl

02:11 <DocScrutinizer05> ???

02:12 <DocScrutinizer05> https://events.ccc.de/camp/2015/wiki/User:Grmpf ?

02:13 <DocScrutinizer05> devo devo devo devo devo devo devo devo devo devo devo devo

02:14 <DocScrutinizer05> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CR3KTg3jhFk

02:15 <R0b0t1> so

02:15 <R0b0t1> long

02:19 <Oksana> DocScrutinizer: about the link: Login required

02:20 <DocScrutinizer05> O.O

02:20 <DocScrutinizer05> get a better IP

02:22 <DocScrutinizer05> how about https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dVGINIsLnqU

02:30 <DocScrutinizer05> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uGdCTy-Vm7o is not my favorite song but a damn good video

02:31 <DocScrutinizer05> and then there's https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xLcW9ArTts0 :-D

02:37 <Oksana> Certificate Authority Invalid, or something like that

20:50 <beyondbuxton> Hello all. Current n900 owner, interested in neo900. What is the current expectation for an OS being available? I am not a guru, I am more an intermediate-skilled user. Cheers!

20:51 <pakisaurus> its not the os you need, its the hardware

20:52 <pakisaurus> you'll need dissassembly skills to install the board

20:52 <pakisaurus> its not that hard tho

20:52 <pakisaurus> a few torx screws and you're in

20:55 <beyondbuxton> I would be ok with that. Or buying a pre-assembled one. My main concern (or rather, question) is about the OS: is there presently a fully-featured OS (comparable to stock n900 image) that will work with the neo900?

20:55 <beyondbuxton> this device would, for me, be a luxury.

20:55 <pakisaurus> http://openphoenux.org/

20:55 <ccnnjj> The goal is to have Fremantle running on the neo900, minus binary blobs.

20:56 <ccnnjj> (so I gather)

20:57 <ccnnjj> I'm not really clear on the state of that. It sounded like most stuff worked, and binary parts replaced, but it's hard to keep track. Someone will jump on the channel later I'm sure and give a better update.

20:59 <jonsger> I heared someone will port replicant for Neo900

21:04 <beyondbuxton> only other question I can think to ask now: are there any stats for which is the most popular radio/modem choice?

21:18 <ccnnjj> DocS pasted some numbers way back in the logs. I don't know when he did that last, or what the most recent nubmers are. A lot of people anecdotaly liked the UMTS-only modem, which unfortunately has poor US-band coverage IIRC. Basically, where you plan to use it should influence your modem choice.

21:20 <beyondbuxton> thank you

21:21 <beyondbuxton> back later for more (and will be consulting logs for that as well)

23:58 <R0b0t1> yeah, not like you guys haven't been doing great work

23:58 <R0b0t1> but

23:58 <R0b0t1> faster pls

23:59 <jonwil> The amount of time the Neo900 is taking to build isn't that far off what it would take in a commercial company, it just a lot more visible and easier to see.

23:59 <Oksana> Hehehe... R0b0t1 : Do not worry, they will release it before their deadline, and not afterwards (not giving names of certain procrastinating mobile-phone-making company)