ravelo has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
mzki has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
SylvieLorxu has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
goiken_ has joined #neo900
knttl has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]
knttl has joined #neo900
goiken_ has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
illwieckz has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
goiken_ has joined #neo900
treeman has joined #neo900
Oksana has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
Oksana has joined #neo900
JRHaigh has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
goiken_ has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]
goiken_ has joined #neo900
xman has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
DocScrutinizer05 has quit [Disconnected by services]
DocScrutinizer05 has joined #neo900
neo900 has joined #neo900
Joerg-Neo900 is now known as Guest6747
neo900 is now known as Joerg-Neo900
Guest6747 has quit [Killed (adams.freenode.net (Nickname regained by services))]
tsuggs has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
goiken_ has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
goiken_ has joined #neo900
paulk-collins has joined #neo900
ss942 has joined #neo900
<ss942>
OH MY GOD IT'S ALIVE
<ss942>
I just wanted to google how to change charger usb in nokia n900, but instead I spend 10 hours on reading why nokia n900 was so amazing and finally I'm here
<how900>
ss942: that's a great way to end up here :)
jonwil has quit [Quit: ChatZilla 0.9.93 [SeaMonkey 2.40/20160120202951]]
jonsger has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
paulk-collins has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
paulk-minnie has joined #neo900
louisdk has joined #neo900
jonsger has joined #neo900
ss942 has quit [Quit: Page closed]
SylvieLorxu has joined #neo900
<enyc>
Joerg-Neo900: wonderful
<enyc>
Joerg-Neo900: i guess this sort of thing is to be expected... I rememer eevblog/dave_jones talking of the "electronics design merry-go-round" =)
<DocScrutinizer05>
well, this one is particularly strange since the chip is only a maybe 6 months old
qws-user-1229 has joined #neo900
qws-user-1228 has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
<ceene>
DocScrutinizer05: what about lattice FPGAs?
<ceene>
they're tiny and some of them even have free as in freedom tools
<bencoh>
what about power/battery?
<DocScrutinizer05>
huh?
<DocScrutinizer05>
ceene: the silego are mixed signal configurable integrated circuits. The logic functions are not as massive as in a FPGA
<ceene>
i know, but i worry that they decide to discontinue products so soon...
<ceene>
funny things people do with lattice's fpgas
<DocScrutinizer05>
sure, they are nice chips, but not exactly what we need here
paulk-minnie has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
<DocScrutinizer05>
we use them here to replace a maybe 4 or 4 'traditional' analog (comparators, opamps) and logic (2-LUT, 3-LUT, like 7400 4 gate NAND. Also D-FF and counters, low power oscillator, delay etc) chips
<DocScrutinizer05>
4 or 5
<wpwrak>
the killer feature are the integrated analog comparators. we use them heavily. lattica don't have that.
<wpwrak>
ah, we're synchronized ;-)
<ceene>
oh, that's right
<ceene>
these are pure digital circuits
<DocScrutinizer05>
and I don't know if latice can even do that, anyway the Silego have a OTP ROM to freeze the config, so they are not per se 'Field Programmable'
<DocScrutinizer05>
it does analog comparator and AD, and it provides a duty-cycle power saving for the two LVM221 RF-sensors
<ceene>
u801 is gps rf lna
<DocScrutinizer05>
so this little chip saves us a maybe 5 others, or alternatively we had to offload all those tasks to the main CPU
<ceene>
u806 i guess
<DocScrutinizer05>
sorry U806
<ceene>
i see
<ceene>
yep, no fpga will do that
<ceene>
they're just not designed for it
<DocScrutinizer05>
exactly
<ceene>
well, time to go home
<ceene>
cya!
<DocScrutinizer05>
and the recent addition of I2C is just a very nice option that came with the new GP5 chips (which I ranted about yesterday). Before we planned to use a GP4 (without I2C) for exactly the same task, except the ADC obviously
<DocScrutinizer05>
before that we planned for an analog comparator (or opamp) and doing the duty-caycle and ADC in OMAP
<DocScrutinizer05>
in OMAP we had to use a PWM IP for that, so the CPU can go asleep while the PWM still handles reducing the power-on time for the greedy LMV221
<DocScrutinizer05>
problem: with such approach we need to make sure the comparator doesn't fire a IRQ during settle time and shutdown with evey cycle of duty
<DocScrutinizer05>
so the comparator needed some enable function too. And then we still had no bias compensation for possible drift between the two LMV221
paulk-collins has joined #neo900
<Joerg-Neo900>
anyway we are using the SLG36533 which is not being phased out. The 'twin' SLG46531 however is, but obviously just to relabel it to SLG46537 and do a tiny SiErr fix along with the die shrink (and/or bonding pad rearrangement) both chips probably have seen for the new even more tiny MSTQFN-22 package