stebalien changed the topic of #ipfs to: Heads Up: To talk, you need to register your nick! Announcements: go-ipfs 0.4.18 and js-ipfs 0.33 are out! Get them from dist.ipfs.io and npm respectively! | Also: #libp2p #ipfs-cluster #filecoin #ipfs-dev | IPFS, the InterPlanetary FileSystem: https://github.com/ipfs/ipfs | Logs: https://botbot.me/freenode/ipfs/ | Forums: https://discuss.ipfs.io | Code of Conduct: https://git.io/vVBS0
ctOS has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity]
Oatmeal has joined #ipfs
vyzo1 has joined #ipfs
vyzo has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]
rubiojr_ has joined #ipfs
vyzo1 has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
vyzo has joined #ipfs
<Swedneck>
i've noticed that `ipfs add` gets really really slow after my node's been up for a while, any one else have the same happen?
tdiesler has joined #ipfs
inetic has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds]
Renich[m] has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
gelmutshmidt has joined #ipfs
Renich[m] has joined #ipfs
tombusby has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
tombusby has joined #ipfs
crest[m] is now known as crest5794[m]
<crest5794[m]>
are there any tools to keep large dataset replicated among a set of ipfs nodes?
<crest5794[m]>
lets say i have a large library of conference recordings e.g. media.ccc.de
sickill has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
sickill has joined #ipfs
hurikhan77 has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
hurikhan77 has joined #ipfs
Forza has joined #ipfs
<Forza>
Hi
<Forza>
Is it possible to export/share a folder in place without ipfs making another local copy?
<lidel>
Forza, ipfs add --help | grep nocopy
codingate[m] has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
inetic has joined #ipfs
bigbluehat has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
<Forza>
lidel: great . Thank
bigbluehat has joined #ipfs
zeden has joined #ipfs
codingate[m] has joined #ipfs
malaclyps has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
Forza has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
Forza has joined #ipfs
malaclyps has joined #ipfs
xcm has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
zeden has quit [Quit: WeeChat 2.2]
xcm has joined #ipfs
zeden has joined #ipfs
rcat has joined #ipfs
spinza has quit [Quit: Coyote finally caught up with me...]
spinza has joined #ipfs
lanlink has joined #ipfs
user_51 has joined #ipfs
placer14 has joined #ipfs
ylp has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
ylp has joined #ipfs
mandric has joined #ipfs
Guest69539 has joined #ipfs
Guest69539 has quit [Client Quit]
mandric has quit [Quit: My MacBook has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]
elux has joined #ipfs
ruby32 has quit [Quit: Leaving]
discopatrick has joined #ipfs
mandric has joined #ipfs
<jamiew>
crest5794[m]: yes, ipfs-cluster. In the ipfs repo and also #ipfs-cluster
<jamiew>
are you from the CCC or just using as an example?
<jamiew>
Swedneck: i have not noticed that and I've had my server's node running for weeks, only restarts when there's new rc or stable release; how long does it take to get slow? is it peer connection related?
<Swedneck>
i can't test in detail rn, but i'm pretty sure it takes less than a day
aschmahmann has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
KwukDuck has joined #ipfs
matt-h has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
bomb-on has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds]
gmoro_ has joined #ipfs
gmoro has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
gmoro_ has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
gmoro_ has joined #ipfs
matt-h has joined #ipfs
Caterpillar2 has joined #ipfs
bomb-on has joined #ipfs
aschmahmann has joined #ipfs
adin has joined #ipfs
aschmahmann has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
clemo has joined #ipfs
aLeSD_ has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
joseminao has joined #ipfs
mandric has quit [Quit: My MacBook has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]
suttin21 has joined #ipfs
ChronosX88 has joined #ipfs
suttin21 has quit [Killed (Sigyn (Spam is off topic on freenode.))]
<Swedneck>
i think an easy way to give people privilege to pin stuff on your node would be nice
<Swedneck>
like give them an API key that allows them to do certain things
<hugbubby>
rn what it does is basically keep a list of named ssh public keys that have "pin permissions" and then accept "tickets" that are signed by those keys
<lidel>
Swedneck, sounds new, if you are able to reproduce it, fill an issue in companion repo :)
<Swedneck>
i don't think cluster is suitable for this use case
<hugbubby>
hmm maybe not lemme check the docs
<Swedneck>
well i'm able to reproduce it in so much as it keeps happening despite restarting the browser, and manually toggling the extension
<jamiew>
hugbubby: I've heard numerous people ask something really similar (how to pin into a cluster) so I think this would be worthwhile. like a microservice that just takes pins
<lidel>
hugbubby, cluster should solve some of issues on the backend, you still need to create frontend on top of its APIs
<Swedneck>
lol, there was a swedish tv series which features androids called "hubbots", or "hubbotar" in swedish
elux has joined #ipfs
jamesaxl has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]
<Swedneck>
hmm, turning off my daemon at least makes ipfs-companion stay in gateway mode
<Swedneck>
starting the daemon again makes ipfs-companion start turning off and on again
<lidel>
Swedneck, if you could fill an issue we could follow up there (write down companion/browser/go-ipfs versions + make a screenshot of Preferences screen etc)
<Swedneck>
alright
Oatmeal has quit [Quit: Suzie says, "TTFNs!"]
<Swedneck>
is there any easy way to screenshot all the preferences?
<lidel>
i think screenshot+scroll+screenshot will get the most important stuff :)
groo[m] has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
lanlink has quit [Quit: lanlink]
Caterpillar2 has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]
<Swedneck>
it's very nice that firefox's screenshot function doesn't work on extension pages, it would have been perfect
sfan519 has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
The_8472 has joined #ipfs
elux has quit [Quit: leaving]
thomasan_ has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
<jamesaxl>
I think ipfs is like freenet kust data in ipfs it is divided to pieces
<jamesaxl>
s/kust/just
<jamesaxl>
it is not divided to pieces*
<hugbubby>
freenet also provides security and privacy guarantees ipfs doesnt
<hugbubby>
you can store and access content over an onion network
<hugbubby>
that's the main difference
<hugbubby>
you store and access content over an onion network by default*
lidel` has joined #ipfs
lidel has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
lidel` is now known as lidel
<hugbubby>
come to think of it, private networks in general on ipfs
<hugbubby>
they make the same mistake, with the one big secret key on every participating peer
<hugbubby>
it's a little silly
<jamesaxl>
hugbubby: then ipfs is not safe to use
<hugbubby>
well, the global ipfs network is safe to use
<hugbubby>
just that private ipfs networks are not particularly private by design, in that they promiscuously propogate a master secret key
<jamesaxl>
hugbubby: understood thank you very much
<jamesaxl>
maybe ipfs need a lot of work
<hugbubby>
IPFS is the best-made implemmentation of what IPFS is trying to do ;p
<hugbubby>
my particular use case means I need to be able to operate a cluster of IPFS nodes that can do my pinning, and the secret key issues with the underlying libp2p make that difficult
<jamesaxl>
hugbubby: I see that ipfs is goo for use and easy, but I still do not know a lot about it, I used just Freenet and I wrote some lines for its API
<jamesaxl>
hugbubby: Have you tested Darkenet mode in ipfs ?
<hugbubby>
No, I consider that kind of a shoe-in ;p. I will store things over darknet on ipfs when they decide to incorporate i2p or kovri. I have no reason to believe it's vulnerable, but tor is a patch and not the tool for the job here.
<hugbubby>
I just use freenet for that.
jchris has joined #ipfs
<jamesaxl>
tor just for newbie. still under development
pecastro has joined #ipfs
<hugbubby>
tor's good for accessing the regular internet over onion routing but any peer to peer network should be using an i2p-like routing protocol, so that there are no "exit" or "entry" nodes
<jamesaxl>
hugbubby: I tried i2p too, but I am still using freenet I know its code and how it work and it will be safe to use in companies using dark-net(decentralized network between many peers) mode or even open-net mode
gmoro_ has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
<hugbubby>
freenet is i2p-like in the way that I am referring to
<jamesaxl>
I am sorry if I defined dark-net mode becuse a lot of people thing that darknet mode is a place for black market
plexigras has joined #ipfs
rendar has quit []
thomasan_ has joined #ipfs
thomasan_ has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
arthuredelstein has quit [Quit: leaving]
arthuredelstein has joined #ipfs
Royaljello has joined #ipfs
jchris has quit [Quit: My MacBook has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]
jchris has joined #ipfs
jchris has quit [Client Quit]
jchris has joined #ipfs
lassulus has quit [Quit: WeeChat 2.2]
emerson has quit [Quit: WeeChat 2.3]
thomasan_ has joined #ipfs
lassulus has joined #ipfs
thomasan_ has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
chmanie has joined #ipfs
Polemos_ has quit [Quit: Leaving]
captain_morgan has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
jchris has quit [Quit: My MacBook has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]
<chmanie>
Hey everyone. I'm trying to make sense of the `js-ipfs-repo` example. I've basically just copied the example code linked here https://github.com/ipfs/js-ipfs-repo#usage and when I try to run the code in node I'm getting the following error: `(node:38983) UnhandledPromiseRejectionWarning: Error: Callback was already called. at /Users/chris/dev/Colony/js-ipfs-repo/node_modules/async/internal/onlyOnce.js:9:32`
jchris has joined #ipfs
The_8472 has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
xelra has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds]
chiui has joined #ipfs
The_8472 has joined #ipfs
enemabandit has quit [Quit: Lost terminal]
thomasan_ has joined #ipfs
jesse22 has joined #ipfs
xelra has joined #ipfs
thomasan_ has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
chiui has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]
goiko has joined #ipfs
goiko has quit [Changing host]
goiko has joined #ipfs
The_8472 has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
Encrypt has joined #ipfs
leeola has joined #ipfs
The_8472 has joined #ipfs
SamM has quit [Quit: SamM]
plexigras has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds]
The_8472 has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
vyzo has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
DRFH1 has joined #ipfs
vyzo has joined #ipfs
The_8472 has joined #ipfs
<DRFH1>
TEST
<jacky>
TEST FAILED
<DRFH1>
lol
jesse22 has quit [Quit: My MacBook has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]
chmanie has quit [Quit: Page closed]
<Swedneck>
mission failed, we'll get em next time
rcat has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
jesse22 has joined #ipfs
jchris has quit [Quit: My MacBook has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]
yusufk[m] has joined #ipfs
jchris has joined #ipfs
thomasan_ has joined #ipfs
thomasan_ has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
mischat has joined #ipfs
}ls{ has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]
mandric has quit [Quit: My MacBook has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]
random_yanek has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds]
ddahl has joined #ipfs
The_8472 has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
thomasan_ has joined #ipfs
jchris has quit [Quit: My MacBook has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]
The_8472 has joined #ipfs
thomasan_ has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
random_yanek has joined #ipfs
xcm has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]
xcm has joined #ipfs
<Swedneck>
man, mfs still makes no sense to me
jesse22 has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
<fiatjaf>
Swedneck, what doesn't make sense?
ctOS has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity]
<Swedneck>
i copied a hash (which is a folder of other hashes) into an mfs directory, but `ipfs files ls` just prints the hash..
<Swedneck>
and `ipfs files read /directory/file` says the file doesn't exist
<fiatjaf>
ipfs files ls /
<fiatjaf>
prints what?
<Swedneck>
oh no, i'm running it with a path
<fiatjaf>
did you do 'ipfs files cp /ipfs/<hash> /directory'?
<Swedneck>
yes
<fiatjaf>
well, my mfs is actually not working right now because go-ipfs is broken
<Swedneck>
which is another thing, it's weird that there's no `ipfs files add`
<fiatjaf>
maybe you have that problem too?
<fiatjaf>
yeah, I think mfs is missing a few plumbing methods
<fiatjaf>
what is the output of `ipfs files ls /`?
<hugbubby>
Atm there's no ability to place restrictions on the person with the master key but rn I'm gonna implemment "multiple user functionality" aka an SSH key folder