sipa changed the topic of #bitcoin-wizards to: This channel is for discussing theoretical ideas with regard to cryptocurrencies, not about short-term Bitcoin development | http://bitcoin.ninja/ | This channel is logged. | For logs and more information, visit http://bitcoin.ninja
weez17 has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
weez17 has joined #bitcoin-wizards
ekrion has joined #bitcoin-wizards
d9b4bef9 has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
worstadmin has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity]
tooth29 has joined #bitcoin-wizards
Belkaar has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]
flokie_ has quit [Quit: Leaving]
Belkaar has joined #bitcoin-wizards
Belkaar has joined #bitcoin-wizards
Belkaar has quit [Changing host]
weez17 has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
Belkaar has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
belcher has quit [Quit: Leaving]
Belkaar has joined #bitcoin-wizards
Belkaar has joined #bitcoin-wizards
Belkaar has quit [Changing host]
Belkaar has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
cryptojanitor has joined #bitcoin-wizards
Belkaar has joined #bitcoin-wizards
Belkaar has joined #bitcoin-wizards
Belkaar has quit [Changing host]
<maaku> someone sent me plasma.io asking for a review
<maaku> as far as I can tell this is just sidechains from 2014?
<maaku> I'm not sure what is new
Samdney has quit [Quit: Verlassend]
<roasbeef> maaku: it's pretty diff from 2014 sidechains
Belkaar has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
Belkaar has joined #bitcoin-wizards
Belkaar has joined #bitcoin-wizards
Belkaar has quit [Changing host]
Noldorin has quit [Quit: My MacBook Pro has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]
isis_ is now known as isis
AaronvanW has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
isis is now known as isis_
Iriez has joined #bitcoin-wizards
legogris has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
justan0theruser has joined #bitcoin-wizards
legogris has joined #bitcoin-wizards
cryptojanitor has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity]
d9b4bef9 has joined #bitcoin-wizards
d9b4bef9 has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
d9b4bef9 has joined #bitcoin-wizards
tooth29 has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
jephalien_ has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
ghost43 has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
arubi has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
ghost43 has joined #bitcoin-wizards
arubi has joined #bitcoin-wizards
jephalien_ has joined #bitcoin-wizards
SopaXorzTaker has joined #bitcoin-wizards
Giszmo has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
jtimon has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
davec has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
davec has joined #bitcoin-wizards
Giszmo has joined #bitcoin-wizards
coinsmurf has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
isis_ is now known as isis
coinsmurf has joined #bitcoin-wizards
Giszmo has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
fletom has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
fletom has joined #bitcoin-wizards
Giszmo has joined #bitcoin-wizards
SopaXorzTaker has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds]
SopaXorzTaker has joined #bitcoin-wizards
kmels has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
ekrion has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
ekrion has joined #bitcoin-wizards
kmels has joined #bitcoin-wizards
kmels has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
kmels has joined #bitcoin-wizards
laurentmt has joined #bitcoin-wizards
laurentmt has quit [Client Quit]
<maaku> roasbeef: the consensus enforcement is locked waiting periods with an spv reorg proof.. looks the same
meshcollider has joined #bitcoin-wizards
SopaXorzTaker has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
d9b4bef9 has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
setpill has joined #bitcoin-wizards
setpill has quit [Quit: o/]
laurentmt has joined #bitcoin-wizards
SopaXorzTaker has joined #bitcoin-wizards
laurentmt has quit [Quit: laurentmt]
laurentmt has joined #bitcoin-wizards
deusexbeer has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
deusexbeer has joined #bitcoin-wizards
laurentmt has quit [Quit: laurentmt]
Samdney has joined #bitcoin-wizards
Guyver2 has joined #bitcoin-wizards
meshcollider has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity]
son0p has joined #bitcoin-wizards
CubicEarths has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
belcher has joined #bitcoin-wizards
CubicEarths has joined #bitcoin-wizards
mgxm has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]
d9b4bef9 has joined #bitcoin-wizards
Emcy has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
Chris_Stewart_5 has joined #bitcoin-wizards
spinza has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]
jtimon has joined #bitcoin-wizards
AaronvanW has joined #bitcoin-wizards
Aaronvan_ has joined #bitcoin-wizards
AaronvanW has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
Chris_Stewart_5 has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
spinza has joined #bitcoin-wizards
Chris_Stewart_5 has joined #bitcoin-wizards
Chris_Stewart_5 has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
<stevenroose> andytoshi: Greg mentions in his CT talk @ Coinbase that with the CT scheme at that time there was a choice between unconditional privacy and computational soundness or either unconditional soundness and computational privacy
<stevenroose> andytoshi: whether that was implemented and/or deployed, I cannot know
<stevenroose> tell*
Olufunmilayo has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]
meshcollider has joined #bitcoin-wizards
SopaXorzTaker has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
dougsland has joined #bitcoin-wizards
Chris_Stewart_5 has joined #bitcoin-wizards
<andytoshi> stevenroose: i implemented an unconditionally sound rangeproof, but we never came up with a satisfactory unconditionally sound assets scheme
<andytoshi> and bulletproofs are not unconditionally sound, but they're so much more efficient that it's hard to go back from them
mgxm has joined #bitcoin-wizards
Chris_Stewart_5 has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
Chris_Stewart_5 has joined #bitcoin-wizards
worstadmin has joined #bitcoin-wizards
<stevenroose> andytoshi: so when they would get deployed on a livenet, it would be all about finding a quantum-proof replacement before it is needed?
Chris_Stewart_5 has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]
<andytoshi> yes
Aaronvan_ has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
shesek has joined #bitcoin-wizards
shesek has joined #bitcoin-wizards
shesek has quit [Changing host]
AaronvanW has joined #bitcoin-wizards
Noldorin has joined #bitcoin-wizards
kmels has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
kmels has joined #bitcoin-wizards
kmels has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]
kmels has joined #bitcoin-wizards
SopaXorzTaker has joined #bitcoin-wizards
isis is now known as isis_
kmels has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]
d9b4bef9 has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
d9b4bef9 has joined #bitcoin-wizards
kmels has joined #bitcoin-wizards
meshcollider has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity]
kmels has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
kmels has joined #bitcoin-wizards
Aaronvan_ has joined #bitcoin-wizards
AaronvanW has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
Chris_Stewart_5 has joined #bitcoin-wizards
son0p has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]
AaronvanW has joined #bitcoin-wizards
Aaronvan_ has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
SopaXorzTaker has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
laurentmt has joined #bitcoin-wizards
Chris_Stewart_5 has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
vicenteH has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
son0p_ has joined #bitcoin-wizards
<stevenroose> That's tricky
<stevenroose> I mean, they will exist. But they might not be feasible footprint-wise
kmels has quit [Quit: Leaving]
CubicEarths has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
SopaXorzTaker has joined #bitcoin-wizards
packetsmurf has joined #bitcoin-wizards
coinsmurf has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
SopaXorzTaker is now known as semiconductor
semiconductor has left #bitcoin-wizards ["Leaving"]
laurentmt has quit [Quit: laurentmt]
<roasbeef> maaku: well it tries to go beyond a re-org proof to generaly invalidity, also diff from 2014 sidechains in that the root block hash of the sidechain is committed in the main chain every few state transitions
<roasbeef> they've mostly moved to a simpler variant, based on peter todd's clients side validatino stuffs
Olufunmilayo has joined #bitcoin-wizards
CubicEarths has joined #bitcoin-wizards
<instagibbs> can someone mirror that pdf ^ ?
<instagibbs> oh wait nevermind, it's there
merlinsbeard has joined #bitcoin-wizards
intcat has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
arubi has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
ghost43 has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
ghost43 has joined #bitcoin-wizards
arubi has joined #bitcoin-wizards
son0p_ has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
intcat has joined #bitcoin-wizards
CubicEarths has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
CubicEarths has joined #bitcoin-wizards
marcoagner has joined #bitcoin-wizards
hndshktst has quit []
cryptojanitor has joined #bitcoin-wizards
dx25 has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
dx25 has joined #bitcoin-wizards
<maaku> "it tries to go beyond a re-org proof to general invalidity" -- meaning? the mainchain has no idea what the consensus rules of the sidechain are
<maaku> " also diff from 2014 sidechains in that the root block hash of the sidechain is committed in the main chain every few state transitions" -- no that was very much a part of the 2014 idea
Samdney has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
<maaku> it's sortof a forced choice. it's the only way you can get things to scale reasonably well and do things like unilateral withdraw
<roasbeef> you'd post a hash of the sidechain, there's a contestation window, if you can prove the transition between this hash and the last was invalid, then things get rolled back to that prior hash
<roasbeef> was it? can't find any mention of that in the paper, just about deposit/withdrawl
<maaku> regarding "general invalidity" the mainchain can't know what the sidechain rules to check are. it just has to understand enough of the rules to check what it cares about, which is the reorg proof
<roasbeef> it's also meant to be hierarchical
<roasbeef> yeh it tries to do more than a re-org proof
<maaku> the paper is an academic paper, it focuses on just the necessary mechanism
<roasbeef> think of there being some master output in the main chain that knows what transitions "should" look like
<maaku> the unilateral withdraw stuff goes back to stuff alex mizrahi started back in 2013
<roasbeef> sure...but if it isn't mentioned in the main paper then not sure how people are meant to just assume various components of the scheme
<maaku> i know there is discussion of implementation approaches in 2014 on wizards, bitcointalk, and reddit
<maaku> i didn't say it was in the paper :)
<roasbeef> yeh i understand that
<maaku> just that this is exactly what was widely being talked about back then
<roasbeef> from my PoV it's very different
Guyver2 has quit [Quit: Going offline, see ya! (www.adiirc.com)]
<maaku> I'm just saying we must be failing at preserving continuity of knowledge if some touted new idea is exactly the same as one from 4 years ago
<maaku> and I still don't see how it's any different at all
son0p_ has joined #bitcoin-wizards
<roasbeef> if it is the very same idea then yes would agree seems there's a shortcoming
<waxwing> oh so it's paillier based? (the new scriptless script ecdsa thing)
<roasbeef> the main diff from my PoV is: there's a permanent output in the main chain for the sidechain, this output gets threaded through (in utxo land), it commits the blockhash of the side chain but also has another clause to verify that an _entire_ block may have violated state transition rules, if that's the case, then the prior output (state) is instead created (a rollback), this lets people do mass withdrawls if funny things happend on the sidechain
<roasbeef> waxwing: yep
<waxwing> istr something similar was done before for .. what was it, threshold multisig?
<roasbeef> maaku: if that's a party of the 2014 idea, then i guess i totally missed it
<roasbeef> waxwing: a 2-party 2-of-2 ecdsa technique
<roasbeef> waxwing: nutshell explanation of it: https://twitter.com/roasbeef/status/989945313728188416
<maaku> roasbeef: the threading through of a single utxo is just a more constrained choice of design space. that's definately the realm of things that were discussed back then.
<maaku> the mass withdraw stuff was 100% considered back in 2014. i built the design for some of that. my employment contracts for blockstream explicitly transfers IP rights for it :)
<maaku> you don't need block invalidity proofs though, you just need a bonded request for dispersal which is invalidated by a proof of extension
<roasbeef> well, then i guess none of this was really communicated to the wider community
<roasbeef> may be the case that the general idea is similar, but the actual impl in there is pretty specific to their target main chain
Alanius has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
meshcollider has joined #bitcoin-wizards