12:04 <houkime> galiven: Oh well. Atom feed. Sorry, haven't noticed that (although I don't really know what is Atom and how often it is used).

12:06 <houkime> galiven: yeah, there are no bugtracker or even forum thread links on neo900.org, at least none in the "first 30 sec" vicinity.

12:09 <houkime> Which is sort of bad. I criticized this a few days ago. Hope to get to it in a week or so if noone else wants to do it.

12:13 <houkime> Maintained issue board is even better in terms of publicity than an edited newsfeed because it actually frequently tells you what's going on.

12:15 <houkime> without any real overhead of having to write extra texts.

19:05 <houkime> trying to understand nfc-sim swp routing reqs (e.g. maximum trace length/lag). ptd 6 and 7 which are connecting nfc with sims are gpio on a microcontroller so no info on reqs there. nfc-draft document also does not provide anything really except for that it is 0.2 - 1.0 Mhz signal. Seems quite uncritical for the moment.

19:10 <Joerg-Neo900> ot is uncritical

19:11 <Joerg-Neo900> ot*

19:11 <Joerg-Neo900> dang

19:11 <Joerg-Neo900> IT*

19:11 <Joerg-Neo900> WingleWireProtocol is a PITA but signal wise uncritical

19:11 <Joerg-Neo900> S*

19:12 <houkime> ok

19:12 <Joerg-Neo900> basically the spec is: one direction is voltage level, return channel is current domain

19:13 <houkime> i know, it is in docs.

19:13 <Joerg-Neo900> I.E the controller provides either high or not so high "supply" voltage wie SWP, and the SIM answers by drawing little or little more current from that

19:14 <Joerg-Neo900> via*

19:14 <Joerg-Neo900> the rest is basically UART

19:16 <houkime> ok