11:09 <GitHub44> [smoltcp] whitequark pushed 1 new commit to master: https://git.io/v5bqB

11:09 <GitHub44> smoltcp/master 64a8270 whitequark: Implement TCP timeouts.

11:09 <whitequark> sb0: was working on keepalive and timeouts

11:10 <whitequark> oh, there's one more glitch to fix with them, sec

12:17 <whitequark> ok, back to reassembly

13:18 <sb0> _florent_, how is the sayma work coming along?

13:18 <sb0> jesd?

13:18 <sb0> did you test the bridge with artiq and my clocking code?

13:18 <sb0> ethernet?

16:00 <GitHub130> [sinara] marmeladapk pushed 1 new commit to master: https://github.com/m-labs/sinara/commit/a8966dbddd488b6c70bb35dc3eea51651bce1926

16:00 <GitHub130> sinara/master a8966db Paweł: Kasli fixes...

20:28 <GitHub58> [sinara] gkasprow pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/m-labs/sinara/compare/a8966dbddd48...1d60a3e119bb

20:28 <GitHub58> sinara/master 1d60a3e Greg: Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/m-labs/sinara

20:28 <GitHub58> sinara/master 9624757 Greg: added BOM

22:42 <GitHub47> [artiq] dhslichter commented on issue #40: I am assuming from this that the offset for a given channel is added to the timestamp sent from the kernel, in other words if you send a timestamp of 0 and the offset is 25, then it goes into the FIFO to be emitted at timestamp 25. Is this correct? If this is the case, negative offsets are really the "useful" ones, in that what you want to do is to be able to send an output (or assign the original time o

22:43 <GitHub192> [artiq] dhslichter commented on issue #40: I am assuming from this that the offset for a given channel is added to the timestamp sent from the kernel, in other words if you send a timestamp of 0 and the offset is 25, then it goes into the FIFO to be emitted at timestamp 25. Is this correct? If this is the case, negative offsets are really the "useful" ones, in that what you want to do is to be able to send an output (or assign the original time