<bb-m-labs>
build #187 of migen is complete: Failure [failed conda_build conda_remove] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/migen/builds/187 blamelist: Sebastien Bourdeauducq <sb@m-labs.hk>
<GitHub25>
[migen] sbourdeauducq pushed 1 new commit to master: https://git.io/v52iw
<GitHub25>
migen/master 1ccf140 Sebastien Bourdeauducq: conda: use new noarch system
<sb0>
hm, I'm actually not sure if it should be py_ or py35_
<_florent_>
rjo: no, I'm able to get CGS and ILAs, good checksum etc... but we loose sync just after
<rjo>
ok. but i have never seen it in ay printouts from those scripts.
<rjo>
maybe we have power supply issues?
<larsc>
receiver?
<rjo>
_florent_: if you are getting that number of errors, i'd expect it to complain and unsync. maybe we should try to get it going with four lanes first (you seemed to be able to get four lanes of PRBS working) while greg circles over the hardware.
<rjo>
_florent_: if we get that going, we can already integrate the rest.
<rjo>
larsc: i'd think a locked and synced DAC uses more power than an unlocked one. maybe the power supply can't cope.
<larsc>
rjo: so FPGA->DAC?
<rjo>
larsc: yes
<rjo>
larsc: would it loos sync after succeeding CGS and ILA if one lane is marginal signal quality and causes a few errors?
<rjo>
*loose
<larsc>
I've seen these resync cycles before
<larsc>
but I don't know exactly what caused them
<rjo>
hmmm
<larsc>
but I believe it is related to the alignment of the LMFCs
<GitHub184>
[artiq] jordens commented on issue #827: I am not referring to the top post, but to your analysis. When doing what you said you did, which misoc version does it install? And which one is in `artiq-dev/meta.yaml`?... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/827#issuecomment-327573761
<GitHub107>
[artiq] arpitagrawal23 commented on issue #827: Actually I had done that at on 9/1 at 15:16 EST, right after @sbourdeauducq had commented on this thread. Had also taken a picture which shows that all modules were downloaded from the internet (and not taken from system's cache).... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/827#issuecomment-327590434
<GitHub6>
[artiq] jordens commented on issue #827: Come on. Nobody can help you if you don't take the questions seriously. Can you reproduce it **now** and using **the steps you listed**? Anything else is less than helpful.... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/827#issuecomment-327593393
<GitHub171>
[artiq] arpitagrawal23 commented on issue #827: Apologies for that. But actually I didn't need any help on this topic. My setup started working fine after explicitly installing the right misoc version by giving conda install command (mentioned in my earlier comments). I just wanted to report that conda env create command is not honouring git hash mentioned in conda/artiq-dev/meta.yaml file and if someone think that it is a valid issue, then it sh