06:20 <sb0> whitequark, in a similar sort of (minor) problem, if the host sends the first byte of a message and then takes a lot of time to complete it, the comms CPU is unresponsive to kernel CPU messages in the meantime

06:21 <sb0> hm and watchdogs are also blocked, which is more concerning

06:28 <sb0> trivial question of style, should it be "=> ()" or "=> {}" in empty branches of match statements?

10:23 <whitequark> sb0: (slow loris) yes.

10:23 <whitequark> (style) => ()

10:27 <cr1901_modern> Is the value of "{}" expression () in Rust?

10:28 <whitequark> yes

10:40 <sb0> error: attributes are not yet allowed on `if` expressions

10:40 <sb0> meh

10:43 <cr1901_modern> I wonder why that is

10:59 <whitequark> sb0: add a #[feature]

10:59 <whitequark> cr1901_modern: there was some parser ambiguity

11:03 <cr1901_modern> whitequark: What do you mean by that? In the "more than one leftmost derivation" sense?

11:04 <whitequark> I dunno

11:04 <whitequark> I don't care

11:06 <cr1901_modern> I wish I had that problem. I'd prob be more productive if I didn't get bogged down with details

11:11 <whitequark> sb0: almost done with rtio_output hijacking...

18:58 <GitHub> [artiq] whitequark pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/compare/623a605d3b9c...04ad26705557

18:58 <GitHub> artiq/master 04ad267 whitequark: firmware: rewrite the dynamic linker in Rust.

18:58 <GitHub> artiq/master 907589f whitequark: satman: simplify Makefile.

19:22 <bb-m-labs> build #421 of artiq-board is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq-board/builds/421

19:27 <bb-m-labs> build #1338 of artiq is complete: Failure [failed python_unittest_2] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq/builds/1338 blamelist: whitequark <whitequark@whitequark.org>