<rds>
a few months back we all talked about this... that was just a matter of time....
<rds>
while the clueless AW, releasing A80 for $100+ boards... which is stupid
<rds>
R-pi set the target of $25 a board
<rds>
and anyone seeling board beyond that will go out of business, it just a matter of time, look at cubietech, radka, etc.....
<rds>
now these guys come and probably will set the target at $9... per board!
<rds>
AW and other chinese companies should have their engineers to look at a dav board for $3,99 because many are probably looking for many design at $4,99 as I write this!
<rds>
weak up All Wiiner, boards of $20 are always set to die really really quick!
<rds>
see you later!
rds has quit [Quit: Page closed]
vishnup has joined #linux-sunxi
steeve has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
Akagi201 has quit []
vishnup has quit [Read error: Connection timed out]
akaizen has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
akaizen has joined #linux-sunxi
FR^4 has joined #linux-sunxi
FR^3 has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]
[7] has quit [Disconnected by services]
TheSeven has joined #linux-sunxi
FR^4 has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
FR^4 has joined #linux-sunxi
p1u3sch1 has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
p1u3sch1 has joined #linux-sunxi
FR^4 has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
FR^4 has joined #linux-sunxi
vishnup has joined #linux-sunxi
nickludlam has quit [Quit: nickludlam]
vishnup has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
JohnDoe_71Rus has joined #linux-sunxi
vishnup has joined #linux-sunxi
JohnDoe_71Rus has quit [Client Quit]
JohnDoe_71Rus has joined #linux-sunxi
JohnDoe_71Rus has quit [Client Quit]
JohnDoe_71Rus has joined #linux-sunxi
vishnup has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
vishnup has joined #linux-sunxi
faisal_ has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
<vishnup>
wens:ping
<wens>
vishnup: pong
<vishnup>
Got it now!! I was not able to get how PB_EINT got value 15 as GIC_SPI
<vishnup>
as in reference manual interrupt value is 47,
<vishnup>
we have to count GIC_SPI from 0, after PPI 15 in reference manual ;)
<plaes>
o_O
<vishnup>
wens: do you mind to rename compatible string for smp as allwinner, sun8i instead of allwinner, sun8i-23.
<vishnup>
?
Netlynx has joined #linux-sunxi
<vishnup>
it is generic for sun8i
<wens>
vishnup: i have no problems with that :)
<wens>
jemk: wonder if it works for h3
<wens>
it won't work for a83, which is also sun8i
<wens>
a83 is multi-cluster, which will need mcpm code i'm working on
<vishnup>
we can add specific compatible string for a83 smp, BTW, which a83t device you have?
<wens>
i don't
<wens>
but the code should be generic enough to share between a80 and a83
<wens>
and it doesn't use a compatible string anyway
<vishnup>
okie, I think h3 smp is as same as a23 and a33, this way let's make it "allwinner, sun8i" compatible.
<plaes>
just wondering whether the sun8iw3p1 for A23 means it's using ARM r0p1 stuff
<vishnup>
h3 cpucfg regs are similar as a23 and a33, hope it'll work :)