06:01 <eintopf> wpwrak: cool

14:57 <kyak> what a shit world to live in..

15:46 <wpwrak> i love the "please rate me" in front of the bus. that's eerily close to present reality.

15:48 <wpwrak> there's also a lovely black mirror episode with a similar theme: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nosedive (article contains spoilers)

19:00 <larsc> IRC is outlawed in that society as an archaic and unsocial communications platform

19:15 <wpwrak> larsc: it'll be impractical anyway. i mean, when they ask you for your whatsapp password when crossing a border, "i use irc" wouldn't be a safe answer: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/02/08/dhs_wants_enhanced_digital_vetting/

19:18 <whitequark> I can't tell CBP the password if it's physically impossible to do so!

19:21 <wpwrak> whitequark: ;et

19:21 <wpwrak> grr

19:22 <wpwrak> the logic is in fact very simple: if you really want to enter the US, you will provide your passwords

19:22 <wpwrak> if you don't provide your passwords, you didn't _really_ want to enter the US. so, no harm in sending you back.

19:22 <whitequark> or a password to a special honeypot account!

19:23 <wpwrak> always those pesky russian hackers ...

21:07 <DocScrutinizer05> will they torture me when I don't have friggin farcebook account? how will they make sure I don't have two FB accounts? Ahh wait, they are phone number interlocked, right?

21:09 <wpwrak> FB, too ? i though it was just whatsapp

21:13 <DocScrutinizer05> no idea, noob here

21:14 <DocScrutinizer05> prolly you're right, yes

21:14 <DocScrutinizer05> anyway they are such jackasses in USA, how would they even know *which* accounts they want the passwords for?

21:15 <DocScrutinizer05> check "which apps are installed"? ROTFL

21:28 <wpwrak> they probably ask you to provide all the accounts you think are important to them. then they'll decide if they're happy with that. if not, you get to check "have you ever been denied entry to the USA" on the next try :)

21:29 <whitequark> DocScrutinizer05: (will they torture me when I don't have friggin farcebook account?) this increasinly sounds less like a sardonic suggestion and more like truth

22:02 <strawberyargon> hows Canada ?

22:03 <DocScrutinizer05> I guess soon they will build a wall at their southern border and make Trump pay for it

22:11 <wpwrak> maybe the wall to mexico is to prevent a massive exodus to the south :)

22:19 <DocScrutinizer05> yeah, he needs to stop all the mexicans that already leave USA (way more leaving than entering)

22:24 <DocScrutinizer05> https://www.theguardian.com/money/us-money-blog/2016/may/12/donald-trump-president-move-to-canada

22:38 <DocScrutinizer05> then I - also thanks Trump - read about ROC Republic of China aka Taiwan lately. And about the quite worrying role the USA play in there

22:46 <DocScrutinizer05> worrying in that it's basically Taiwan's only 'warranty' against mainland China simply usurping them

22:46 <DocScrutinizer05> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic_of_China

23:05 <DocScrutinizer05> ((how would they even know *which* accounts)) I think I have to `mv ~/.ssh/id_rsa ~/linenoise` on my portable devices, and make sure any ssh commandlines are never added to shell history

23:16 <DocScrutinizer05> echo -e "\n`cat .ssh/id_dsa `" >>goatse.jpg

23:17 <DocScrutinizer05> ssh -i <(tail -n1 goatse.jpg) my-sekrit-server

23:18 <DocScrutinizer05> best in it: it still works as a normal jpg

23:27 <DocScrutinizer05> sorry, improved version: echo -e "\n`cat .ssh/id_dsa|uuencode -`" >>goatse.jpg; ssh -i <(tail -n1 goatse.jpg|uudecode) my-sekrit-server

23:27 <DocScrutinizer05> hmm, maybe needs tail -n2 then

23:28 <DocScrutinizer05> I leave that as an exercise to you ;-)

23:30 <DocScrutinizer05> particularly since .ssh/id_dsa might well be multi-line, and still is in uuencoded form

23:31 <DocScrutinizer05> s/tail -n1/grep -A99 begin/

23:38 <wpwrak> sed 1d ?

23:39 <DocScrutinizer05> depends on your jpg

23:40 <DocScrutinizer05> mustn't have a single incidental 0x10 or 0x13 then

23:40 <DocScrutinizer05> err 0x0a 0x0d

23:41 <DocScrutinizer05> occurrence of an incidental "begin " is more unlikely ;-)

23:42 <wpwrak> aah, i see the >>. now i get what you're doing

23:42 <DocScrutinizer05> but since the goatse.jpg is 'static' you can check if sed 1d works too :-)

23:44 <wpwrak> yeah, but it's not likely to work, statistically :)

23:45 <DocScrutinizer05> :nod:

23:45 <DocScrutinizer05> jr@saturn:~> wc -l test.jpg

23:45 <DocScrutinizer05> 398 test.jpg

23:46 <DocScrutinizer05> -rw-r--r-- 1 jr users 83546 13. Feb 00:15 test.jpg

23:54 <DocScrutinizer05> jr@saturn:~> echo -e "\n`cat .ssh/id_dsa.pub|uuencode -`" >>test.jpg

23:54 <DocScrutinizer05> jr@saturn:~> wc -l test.jpg; l test.jpg; grep -a -A99 begin test.jpg|uudecode

23:54 <DocScrutinizer05> 427 test.jpg

23:54 <DocScrutinizer05> -rw-r--r-- 1 jr users 85103 13. Feb 00:47 test.jpg

23:54 <DocScrutinizer05> ssh-dss AAAAB3NzaC1kc3MAAAEBAP8Bo+QhQ3s1qaC6AyzC9Ep4ud5vuiyf9n0o/BAy/IYNgs14svWrpv6H[...]

23:58 <DocScrutinizer05> don't know how to use a CPU based tool to find reasonable strings in `string test.jpg` - wetware based pattern matching only reveals "begin" and a lot of gibberish

23:58 <DocScrutinizer05> "begin 644 -" actually

23:59 <DocScrutinizer05> you could avoid that too, but needs way more typing then, and memorizing offsets or searchstrings