ChanServ changed the topic of #picolisp to: PicoLisp language | Channel Log: https://irclog.whitequark.org/picolisp/ | Check also http://www.picolisp.com for more information
orivej has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
beneroth_ has left #picolisp [#picolisp]
beneroth|idle has joined #picolisp
Regenaxer has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]
ubLIX has quit [Quit: ubLIX]
aw- has joined #picolisp
xkapastel has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity]
aw- has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
freemint has quit [Quit: Leaving]
orivej has joined #picolisp
Regenaxer has joined #picolisp
mtsd has joined #picolisp
rob_w has joined #picolisp
clacke_movim has left #picolisp [#picolisp]
clacke_movim has joined #picolisp
clacke_movim has left #picolisp [#picolisp]
mtsd has quit [Quit: leaving]
clacke_movim has joined #picolisp
mtsd has joined #picolisp
clacke_movim has left #picolisp [#picolisp]
clacke_movim has joined #picolisp
anjaa has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]
paragus has joined #picolisp
paragus has quit [Client Quit]
paragus has joined #picolisp
paragus has quit [Client Quit]
mtsd has quit [Quit: Lost terminal]
mtsd has joined #picolisp
_whitelogger has joined #picolisp
Blue_flame has joined #picolisp
orivej has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]
Blue_flame has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]
xkapastel has joined #picolisp
ubLIX has joined #picolisp
orivej has joined #picolisp
miskatonic has joined #picolisp
miskatonic has quit [Quit: ERC (IRC client for Emacs 24.5.1)]
test has joined #picolisp
test is now known as Guest1428
Guest1428 has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
mtsd has quit [Quit: leaving]
xkapastel has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity]
rob_w has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
xkapastel has joined #picolisp
ubLIX has quit [Quit: ubLIX]
<Regenaxer> Strange! Suddenly I cannot connect to strato.de any more! It works from a remote server though
<Regenaxer> Is anything wrong with this traceroute? http://ix.io/1LGr
<Regenaxer> What do all the "* * *" mean?
miskatonic has joined #picolisp
miskatonic has quit [Quit: ERC (IRC client for Emacs 24.5.1)]
miskatonic has joined #picolisp
miskatonic has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
miskatonic has joined #picolisp
<Regenaxer> Hmm, seems to mean "not reacheable"
<Regenaxer> So Strato blocks me? I call them
<miskatonic> hasn't strato already caused similar problems last year? or two years ago? three?
<Regenaxer> Not sure
<Regenaxer> The hotline cant help
<Regenaxer> But as I understand the traceroute output, it can't be my fault, right?
<miskatonic> I am not the ultimate firewall expert ... or router expert ... or whatever is needed for that purpose
<tankf33der> strato.de now available over the world
<Regenaxer> I know. It is only me that is blocked
<Regenaxer> Must be some firewall
<Regenaxer> I think I know the reason
<Regenaxer> I have a prepared POST form in my browser
<Regenaxer> which immediatily logs me in
<Regenaxer> I think they changed their login form
<Regenaxer> Now my POST dbes not fit any more
<Regenaxer> Thinking I'm an attacker they blocked my IP
<Regenaxer> I can connect from any other machine
<Regenaxer> and also if I disable Wifi
<Regenaxer> it is only my router which is blocked
<Regenaxer> Strato hotline did not understand me
<Regenaxer> Of course I'm not blocked on the customer level
<Regenaxer> but on the IP level
<Regenaxer> Hotline can't see that
<Regenaxer> But I can\t connect or ping
<Regenaxer> and also traceroute doesnt find (see above)
<tankf33der> try heise.de
<tankf33der> :)
<Regenaxer> :)
<tankf33der> pings?
<Regenaxer> Dont work
<Regenaxer> connect neither
<Regenaxer> browser in www.strato.de times out
<Regenaxer> *only* my router is blocked
<Regenaxer> mobile works
<Regenaxer> or ssh to another server and then connect
<Regenaxer> $ ping strato.de
<Regenaxer> PING strato.de(www.strato.de (2a01:238:20a:202:6660:0:198:33)) 56 data bytes
<Regenaxer> ... hangs
beneroth|idle has quit [Quit: Verlassend]
beneroth has joined #picolisp
<beneroth> Regenaxer, the AS which blocks you according to the traceroute is strato: https://bgp.he.net/AS6724
<beneroth> so your suspicion is most likely what happened
<Regenaxer> Hi beneroth! :)
<Regenaxer> "Please wait while we validate your browser."
<Regenaxer> moment
<beneroth> but yeah, non-technical 1st level support who is to stupid (or forbidden) to get one connected to a real tech guy is really annoying
<Regenaxer> yeah
<beneroth> validate browser..got the same, probably some kind of bot-prevention
<beneroth> or well. JS rambleed exploit check ;-)
<Regenaxer> w3m does not work
<Regenaxer> but PilBox does! :)
<beneroth> kk
<beneroth> I've to go, have a nice evening!
<Regenaxer> What is AS path?
<Regenaxer> ok, thanks!!
<beneroth> AS = autonomous system, basically one of the "nets" the "inter-net" is made of.
<Regenaxer> ok
<beneroth> basically an ISP. one network peered to other network
<Regenaxer> Question is how I get in again
<beneroth> keep pushing strato support
<Regenaxer> I will call the hotline again tomorrow :)
<Regenaxer> yep!
<beneroth> yep
<Regenaxer> Perhaps it works by itself after some time
<beneroth> use this: https://xkcd.com/806/
<beneroth> possibly, you don't want a too huge ban list in IPtables. though I don't know how IP blocking on AS level works, thats probably lower level...dunno
<beneroth> bbl
<Regenaxer> oh, yeah ;)
<Regenaxer> afp
clacke_movim has left #picolisp [#picolisp]
ubLIX has joined #picolisp
<Regenaxer> Cool, Strato access is working again
orivej has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]
orivej has joined #picolisp
miskatonic has quit [Quit: ERC (IRC client for Emacs 24.5.1)]
alexshendi has joined #picolisp
alexshendi has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
alexshendi has joined #picolisp
orivej has quit [Ping timeout: 258 seconds]
<Regenaxer> Trying DeltaChat ... really cool
<beneroth> hey Regenaxer
<Regenaxer> Good evening beneroth
<beneroth> Good evening :)
<beneroth> hm.. well DeltaChat is technically just an email client, no?
<beneroth> with all the disadvantages of current email
<beneroth> I'm hoping for https://darkmail.info to get traction
<Regenaxer> email client, well
<Regenaxer> I would say messenger using IMAP
<beneroth> IMAP has many problems
<beneroth> well, security-wise
<Regenaxer> I was trying Briar for a way but gave up
<beneroth> yeah
<beneroth> not scalable
<Regenaxer> I think it is scalable
<Regenaxer> But you cant export or backup
<Regenaxer> And hard to establish contacts
<Regenaxer> At least Delta uses end-to-end encryption
<Regenaxer> Lavabit is back?
<Regenaxer> Delta is at least decentralized
<Regenaxer> and end-to-end
<Regenaxer> and works also with other clients
<beneroth> not back, but trying to re-invent email standards
<beneroth> yes, but no forward-secrecy, and huge amounts of metadata
<Regenaxer> Whats wrong with imap?
<Regenaxer> mail headers?
<beneroth> no encryption, PGP = content encryption (which is not even including subject line)
<beneroth> aye
<Regenaxer> no forward-secrecy is a lack, yes, but pgp could be replaced by something else in the future
<beneroth> well TLS is nowadays standard for client connections...but it's not guaranteed.
<beneroth> well pgp is fine. the issue is all that unencrypted metadata in the mail headers
<beneroth> pgp is not enough for secure emails
<Regenaxer> you mean source and dest?
<Regenaxer> Better than a central server
<beneroth> aye, and the whole routing in between, timestamps
<Regenaxer> yes, but heterogeneous
<beneroth> for resilience and customer care, yes. but not for security.
<tankf33der> i will try deltachat tomorrow (ios)
<beneroth> somewhat heterogeneous, but I don't think its that type of heterogeneous which results in security gains
<Regenaxer> I think signal is worse than, using a central server
<Regenaxer> you must trust a single authority
<beneroth> T, though likely more secure.
<Regenaxer> if you trust
<beneroth> well that authority is not the server, but the app dev
<beneroth> with signal, I argue
<beneroth> signal runs on google infrastructure. but fully encrypted.
<Regenaxer> Briar would be really cool, if it were usable
<beneroth> T
<beneroth> not practical enough
<Regenaxer> right
<beneroth> what about the TOR-based messenger?
<beneroth> I forgot the name
<Regenaxer> briar is tor based
<beneroth> ah right
<Regenaxer> so in theory optimal
<beneroth> I meant https://ricochet.im/
<beneroth> it creates a hidden service (or multiple) per chat client within TOR
<beneroth> per contact
<beneroth> not client
<Regenaxer> Sounds good
<beneroth> should also work on mobile etc...
<beneroth> only problem is maybe a bit overhead
<Regenaxer> ok
<Regenaxer> But even with tor a secret service with enough resources can track source -> dest
<Regenaxer> So I dont feel too bad with Delta
<beneroth> that is also true about delta
<Regenaxer> right
<Regenaxer> even easier
<beneroth> delta is a lot worse in that regard
<Regenaxer> Thats what I meant, you cant escape anyway
<Regenaxer> I want at least something better than WhatsApp
<beneroth> T, though observing whole network traffic is a pretty high barrier
<Regenaxer> so almost anything
<Regenaxer> T
<Regenaxer> But Briar was not accepted by my kids and friends
<Regenaxer> Delta is easier
<beneroth> China (both legally and technically) and Russia (legally) are outlawing/banning TOR
<beneroth> not hacking it much
<Regenaxer> :(
<beneroth> yeah. I think I read about other IMAP-based messengers recently. good comfort. and email works pretty reliable
<beneroth> I mean that speaks for the security of TOR ;-)
<Regenaxer> yes
<beneroth> look we here still use IRC :P
<Regenaxer> I run a tor node on 7fach.de
<Regenaxer> haha
<beneroth> relay though, yes?
<beneroth> since how many years?
<Regenaxer> yes
<Regenaxer> I ran it many years now, with a gap between
<Regenaxer> took too much bandwidth on my old erver
<Regenaxer> server
<Regenaxer> now it is fine
<beneroth> exit nodes are a pretty big risks even here. not so much for not getting out of trouble, but for legal forces not knowing enough about it / not caring, so you might get a SWAT team and all computers confiscated for months or years.
<Regenaxer> yes, didn't dare an exit node
<beneroth> cannot do it as small IT company.
<Regenaxer> You can limit the bandwidth
<beneroth> the bandwith is not the issue.
<Regenaxer> customers?
<beneroth> something nasty being tracked back to your IP is it.
<Regenaxer> hmm
<beneroth> so you get a police raid because they believe you are a child porn webhoster / consumer or a terrorist or whatever
<Regenaxer> T
<beneroth> I mean there was such an incident (which was completely constructed, so basically to make people afraid of running anon/security hosting) in germany recently
<beneroth> ok, no, 1 year ago
<Regenaxer> iirc even several
<beneroth> not a good article
<Regenaxer> Not tor related, right?
<beneroth> no
<beneroth> T
<beneroth> not tor. some secure anon email offering hosted there. and some blog in usa using an email address from that server, and that blog having leaked/hacked material on it.
<beneroth> like...website with a @gmail.com address in the impressum with leaked/hacked stuff on it leading to raid at google mail offices... absolutely silly
<Regenaxer> I did not know Autocrypt
<beneroth> ah
<beneroth> that dortmund story also raided Zwiebelfreunde.. TOR support group basically
<beneroth> "Dabei ging es der zuständigen Generalstaatsanwaltschaft zufolge um einen anonym betrieben Blog, auf dem zu Gewalt gegen den AfD-Bundesparteitag aufgerufen wurde. Als Kontaktmöglichkeit ist dort lediglich eine beim US-Anbieter RiseUp gehostete E-Mail-Adresse angegeben.
<beneroth> Weil die Zwiebelfreunde für diesen Dienst Spenden sammeln"
<beneroth> ah
<beneroth> I looked at AutoCrypt some time ago
<Regenaxer> Alles Terroristen!!
<beneroth> Aye! nothing to hide!
<beneroth> the achilles heel of AutoCrypt is, that it easily falls victim to MitM attack
<beneroth> its opportunistic security
<Regenaxer> I see
<beneroth> "can be detected by the user with a manual verification" yeah nobody is doing that
<beneroth> and also not implemented "A verification mechanism is not part of version 1.0 of Autocrypt, but is planned for future work."
<Regenaxer> yep, the hash prints
<beneroth> I thought about implementing it in my email services for customers, but with such weaknesses, I see no advantage really
<beneroth> too unreliable to being worth the effort. as it anyway only comes into effect if an email contacts email-server is also supporting it...
<beneroth> I believe only a complete overhaul of the email standards can make email secure. so Dark Mail Alliance.
<Regenaxer> The mail-server does not care about it
<beneroth> stuff like AutoCrypt might be better than nothing...but so is proper TLS between the email servers...
<beneroth> well T, the email client does, but still
<beneroth> I think there is also an AutoCrypt variant where you have it on the email server.
<Regenaxer> ok
<beneroth> its worse than on the client (real e2e), but more practical in many settings.
<Regenaxer> I dont mind about the overhead here
<Regenaxer> messengers have always
<beneroth> but why do it, when it can be easily MitMed.. it's just overhead for when one is not under targeted attack..and then email servers using TLS is about a similar level of protection...well a bit less, but not much in practice.
<beneroth> I mean also overhead with maintenance etc.. for humans
<Regenaxer> I think not so easily MitM
<Regenaxer> if you start the connection in life
<Regenaxer> interactive
<beneroth> sender server or target server can just pretend to not support AutoCrypt (anymore)
<Regenaxer> communicating via other channels
<beneroth> well yeah..but you don't do that, as that goes against the comfort feature Autocrypt relies on :)
<beneroth> well, then do real PGP
<beneroth> (which has the metadata problem again)
<Regenaxer> key infrastructure is tedious
<Regenaxer> nobody does
<beneroth> T
<Regenaxer> I want to get off of WhatsApp, and there is no better way
<Regenaxer> acceptance
<beneroth> ok, tell me when you managed to it that way
<Regenaxer> lets see
<Regenaxer> still difficult
<Regenaxer> family chat :)
<Regenaxer> also in business mail is easier accepted than WhatsApp
<beneroth> I also want to get off WhatsApp. technology is not the issue, network effect is. I even have customers I mainly communicate with using WhatsApp, more comfort than email for them :(
<beneroth> b2b yes. b2c whatsapp is nice / cannot get rid of once used.
<Regenaxer> comfort yes
<Regenaxer> but contacts are spied out
<Regenaxer> Delta keeps your contacts locally
<beneroth> point
<beneroth> not nsa secure, but at least safe from facebook datakraken
<Regenaxer> exactly
<beneroth> some time ago I read a good article, which had as a main point: hey, you promised us, and still promise, targeted ads for all the data we feed you. BUT not even that works!
<beneroth> so just stop it!
<beneroth> if it would work, than maybe your argument had some merit, but no, we get everywhere a lot of ads, even personalized by email from vendor companies, who should know better by existing data.
<Regenaxer> and it is all ovevalued
<Regenaxer> over
<beneroth> or stuff like shopping online for a product = getting ads for same category of products for weeks ...that is just stupid, as when you bought the product, you dont want or need more!
<beneroth> T
<beneroth> zero sum game
<beneroth> with costs
<Regenaxer> right
<Regenaxer> a spiral
<beneroth> best feature of internet services being financed on it is the undeniable well-working social cross-financing aspect (people financing with internet services when buying IRL products for people who don't and can't buy products and would not be able to pay for the internet service)
<beneroth> but it comes with a huge cost overhead, feeding all this marketing and office administrator jobs in the loop
<beneroth> and having some of the smartest people on earth working on "how to get someone to click on something" instead of letting them work on scientific development / technology / medicine...
<beneroth> damn high hidden overhead costs...
<Regenaxer> yeah, huge waste
<Regenaxer> like all in this growth-based system
<beneroth> aye
<beneroth> well most (all?) of this incredible well scaling "unicorn" business models are nothing else than social-psychological MitM attack, getting a monopoly (network effect) on a social interaction as the middleman
<beneroth> then you can charge for value/work mainly done by other people, you charge for connecting them, and you got somehow a monopoly on this connection-making. because people got trained into lazy.
<Regenaxer> Nature is a huge waste too
<Regenaxer> in some regards
<beneroth> ad industry companies like google and facebook are this connector between marketing departments and web real estate (content, websites, apps where ads can be placed)
<beneroth> facebook is just insourcing the whole content part too, though its all created by its users...
<beneroth> T
<Regenaxer> :)
<Regenaxer> I go to sleep
<Regenaxer> We cant change the world
<beneroth> there is the other view that waste is good, as waste is a symptom of surplus production, which is a symptom of an efficient production. though that view kinda collapses when resources are limited (be it input resources or space for externalisation of costs like pollution)
<beneroth> we can't, though we might sometimes be in the position to tip it over!
<Regenaxer> true
<beneroth> being able to detect those opportunities are important :)
<beneroth> if you get such opportunities, and if you can make use of it, than you can tip the world over, and so you change it.
<Regenaxer> I'm always optimistic
<beneroth> hey you released picolisp :)
<beneroth> and pilDB :)
<Regenaxer> oha
<beneroth> you surely changed my world :)
<Regenaxer> haha, no
<beneroth> if someone manages to build a good system with it which in turn makes some medical researcher more efficient, then you played a part in healing cancer :)
<beneroth> IT can only support other people in being more efficient, we don't produce much ourselves... well maybe algorithms and some logics...but yeah...
<beneroth> good night :)
<Regenaxer> yep
<Regenaxer> ok, good night beneroth!
<Regenaxer> ☺
<Regenaxer> afp
<tankf33der> my deltachat qr code
ubLIX has quit [Quit: ubLIX]
orivej has joined #picolisp
ubLIX has joined #picolisp