14:07 <reynir> Can I unpin sexplib.113.33.00+4.03 now?

15:16 <hannes> reynir: yes! v0.9.1 seems to work

15:16 <reynir> Great! Thanks

15:17 <dstolfa> hannes: Saw the upstreaming of the arch-independent ukvm, nice work by mato :)

15:18 <hannes> yes, I'm thankful to have mato working on that! this is great! :)

15:21 <dstolfa> Yeah! :)

15:23 <mato> it'll get officially announced (also to freebsd-virtualization maybe) once things have settled down a bit and also the multi-arch part lands

15:23 <mato> so another couple of weeks maybe...

15:23 <mato> depends if we end up doing the renaming as well, that is a lot of boring work.

15:24 <hannes> while renaming is boring, I'd appreciate if it would not be called ukvm ;)

15:26 <mato> so would i, it'll just take time, that's all.

16:02 <kensan> mato: A quick question regarding PR 178: should I update that pull request or simply close it and open a new one for the discussed changes?

16:05 <hannes> kensan: update it by force-pushing

16:07 <lars_kurth> Hi all, I have a prospective outreachy candidate for "Tiny VM for load testing" who would the mentor be?

16:08 <kensan> hannes: I ask because the changes will not actually address the original issue but fix a different one.

16:08 <reynir> maker: I made a PR for letsencrypt/boulder about the annoying missing terms-of-service thing https://github.com/letsencrypt/boulder/pull/2663

16:09 <maker> :)

16:10 <hannes> kensan: but discussion happened in 178, and you can edit the title, no?

16:11 <kensan> hannes: Yes, just wanted to make sure that's the preferred workflow.

16:20 <hannes> lars_kurth: you may have more luck asking on the mailing list

16:28 <lars_kurth> hannes: Thanks. Just noticed that Dave Scott created the task