01:47 <whitequark> sb0: yes, back

02:02 <GitHub192> [artiq] whitequark commented on issue #638: @sbourdeauducq oh, I misread that. I agree that this should work. I will look into it. https://git.io/v1a7H

02:16 <GitHub2> [artiq] sbourdeauducq commented on issue #639: In 3.x you can use this:... https://git.io/v1a5A

02:54 <sb0> whitequark, https://github.com/nathan7/libfringe/pull/56 is merged

02:55 <sb0> also, could the memory corruption be coming from improperly done context switches or something like that?

03:01 <whitequark> no

03:01 <sb0> whitequark, why are send() and recv() in libksupport/lib.rs instead of mailbox.rs?

03:02 <whitequark> they're not used in the comms cpu code

03:03 <whitequark> that code uses kern_send in session.rs, which also prints a log message

03:03 <whitequark> and also waits through the coroutines

03:03 <sb0> yes, sure, but now I want to use them outside ksupport/lib.rs and I have a problem

03:04 <whitequark> why do you want a busy wait on comms cpu?

03:04 <sb0> I want to use them on the kernel CPU

03:04 <sb0> but in rtio.rs

03:04 <whitequark> then you don't have this problem

03:04 <whitequark> use ::send(...)

03:04 <whitequark> oh, wait

03:04 <whitequark> rtio..

03:04 <whitequark> no, that's still in ksupport. sure. use ::send.

03:07 <whitequark> sb0: privacy for items in rust is only for modules external to the current one

03:07 <whitequark> anything nested in the current module can freely use private fns, types, etc

03:10 <whitequark> sb0: going to use kc705 for a minute

03:12 <whitequark> sb0: btw libfringe#56 is merged but is not released yet

06:17 <GitHub67> [artiq] sbourdeauducq pushed 2 new commits to master: https://git.io/v1VfD

06:17 <GitHub67> artiq/master bc36bda Sebastien Bourdeauducq: perform RTIO init on comms CPU side

06:17 <GitHub67> artiq/master 5accb7a Sebastien Bourdeauducq: manual: add missing quote

06:23 <whitequark> sb0: got the mass spec tube

06:25 <sb0> great!

06:25 <sb0> I'm in the lab right now

06:25 <whitequark> sb0: ok then I will head out for the lab

06:27 <sb0> ok, see you

06:36 <bb-m-labs> build #258 of artiq-board is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq-board/builds/258

06:59 <bb-m-labs> build #1156 of artiq is complete: Failure [failed python_unittest_1] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq/builds/1156 blamelist: Sebastien Bourdeauducq <sb@m-labs.hk>

10:42 <GitHub78> [artiq] jordens pushed 2 new commits to phaser2: https://git.io/v1Vla

10:42 <GitHub78> artiq/phaser2 f6071a5 Robert Jordens: sawg/hbf: tweak pipeline for timing

10:42 <GitHub78> artiq/phaser2 b7a308d Robert Jordens: fir: register multiplier output

11:16 <bb-m-labs> build #259 of artiq-board is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq-board/builds/259

11:24 <GitHub150> [artiq] sbourdeauducq pushed 3 new commits to master: https://git.io/v1VR4

11:24 <GitHub150> artiq/master 0a9f69a Sebastien Bourdeauducq: kc705_drtio_master: add missing rtio_core CSRs

11:24 <GitHub150> artiq/master 09fb486 Sebastien Bourdeauducq: runtime: centralize (D)RTIO management

11:24 <GitHub150> artiq/master 4422b69 Sebastien Bourdeauducq: runtime: silence unused variable warnings

11:46 <bb-m-labs> build #260 of artiq-board is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq-board/builds/260

12:09 <bb-m-labs> build #1157 of artiq is complete: Failure [failed python_unittest_1] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq/builds/1157 blamelist: Sebastien Bourdeauducq <sb@m-labs.hk>

12:41 <rjo> whitequark: irclog.w.o is 504ing.

14:54 <whitequark> rjo: up for me now

14:54 <whitequark> let me check the logs to see what caused it...

16:28 <GitHub140> [artiq] jordens commented on issue #615: https://irclog.whitequark.org/m-labs/2016-11-09#18135928 https://git.io/v1Vpm

16:38 <whitequark> rjo: no obvious reason it died, I assume it exhausted the persistent connection pool

16:38 <whitequark> I've enlarged just that

16:48 <GitHub144> [artiq] jmizrahi commented on issue #615: @jordens Was this directed at my question? If so I don't follow. https://git.io/v1wee

16:51 <GitHub70> [artiq] jordens commented on issue #615: This was a proposal for a solution. https://git.io/v1wea

18:15 <GitHub7> [artiq] cr1901 commented on issue #615: @jordens This isn't relevant to the problem @jmizrahi has. @jmizrahi just wants the patch backported to misoc 0.3/artiq 0.2 for testing. But since paths changed between that release and the current head, the patch fails.... https://git.io/v1wYB

18:16 <GitHub50> [artiq] cr1901 commented on issue #615: @jordens This isn't relevant to the problem @jmizrahi has. @jmizrahi just wants the patch backported to misoc 0.3/artiq 0.2 for testing. But since paths changed between that release and the current head, the patch fails.... https://git.io/v1wYB

23:20 <GitHub194> [artiq] jordens commented on issue #615: It is relevant because it is a simpler solution. https://git.io/v1wx0