<azonenberg_lab> hi B0101, sorry i missed you earlier
<azonenberg_lab> What were you saying about a logo?
<B0101> I made a logo for my Chip Fab unit. I wanted you to tell me your opinion about my logo
<azonenberg_lab> sure (though i freely admit i suck at artistic stuff)
<B0101> lol, give me a second
<azonenberg_lab> Lol i gotta clean up after this experiment anyway, i'll be a minute or two
<B0101> If you're back, heres the link: http://imgbin.org/index.php?page=image&id=4282
<azonenberg_lab> Ok, sec
<azonenberg_lab> Switching to my other computer
<azonenberg> Back
<B0101> ok
<azonenberg> Animated? Not bad
<azonenberg> A little flashy for my liking though
<azonenberg> what's RRF stand for?
<azonenberg> rm -rf? :P
<B0101> no
<B0101> I'll tell you what it stands for in a moment
<CIA-67> homecmos r90 | trunk/lithography-tests/labnotes/azonenberg_labnotes.txt | Today's lab notes
<azonenberg> So today I made some experimental microprobes
<azonenberg> getting dimensions off the pics now
<azonenberg> They're sharp, that much is obvious
<azonenberg> Let's see - shank kis 406 microns / 233 pixels, which makes this image 1.742 microns per pixel
<azonenberg> Middle part is 52 pixels, which is 90 um
<azonenberg> Then in the high res image the middle is 90 um / 491 pix = 183 nm/pixel
<azonenberg> And the tip is somewhere under 13 pixels (2.3 um) across
<azonenberg> The image was a bit blurred though
<azonenberg> so it might even be sharper
<B0101> Oh
<azonenberg> In any case it's most definitely sharp enough to hit anything i can make on this process, with room to spare
<B0101> Ok
<B0101> going back... RRF stands for the first letter of my brother's friends
<azonenberg> Ah, i see
<azonenberg> So the bunch of you are your own little hackerspace?
<B0101> nope. used to be good friends... but because of an argument... we broke off
<B0101> RRF = Rusydi, Royce, Feng Qiang
<azonenberg> Ah
<B0101> I only joined in last year
<B0101> They liked doing software
<azonenberg> And you started pushing toward hardware?
<B0101> It was Royce who started pushing towards hardware
<B0101> I only joined to help out with my brother
<azonenberg> i see
<B0101> If you look at my logo, you might notice a zero detect circuit
<azonenberg> I just see five test points
<B0101> Did you see that if you go down the test points, you will see 4 lines?
<azonenberg> Yeah
<B0101> thats the zero detect circuit
<azonenberg> But i see no interconnection
<B0101> my logo was based on a portion of my brothers 4 bit relay computer
<azonenberg> oh, i see
<B0101> it was a very small portion of the whole circuit
<azonenberg> I figured as much
<B0101> do you know VHDL?
<azonenberg> B0101: Not yet, i've been studying verilog though
<berndj> VHDL reminds me too much of cobol
<berndj> OR SIGNAL TO B GIVING B
<azonenberg> Lol, to me it looks like Ada
<berndj> azonenberg, does glade come with a simulator?
<azonenberg> berndj: It's a pure low-level layout tool
<berndj> (i know neither ada nor cobol, really, i'll take your word for it)
<azonenberg> Extraction is done via python scripts (they have an example script for a hypothetical 150nm process)
<berndj> any other layout tools you've tried?
<azonenberg> LayoutEditor but it sucks
<B0101> berndj: I tried programming in COBOL before... I can only say something
<berndj> i've tried half a handful and so far is the one that sucks least
<azonenberg> so far glade is?
<azonenberg> Yeah, it has some segfaults but is otherwise pretty decent
<berndj> *and so far magic is
<azonenberg> Oh, magic
<B0101> berndj: Its a SIN to teach COBOL
<berndj> i don't mean to sound like i'm pushing it
<berndj> B0101, not so long ago i knew a guy who was taking a cobol course
<azonenberg> No, i want inputs from a lot of people
<azonenberg> Preferably people who have tried >1 tool
<azonenberg> and can provide a reasonable argumetn as to why one is better than the other for a given purpose
<berndj> i've "tried" >1, but for a loose definition of "tried"
<azonenberg> Asking people in industry will get you nowhere because most of them are using cadence or synopsys
<azonenberg> which are nice but insanely expensive
<berndj> mostly, it was, "started the program and couldn't figure out wtf to do then gave up"
<azonenberg> Lol yeah
<berndj> which was the case with electric and that french thing whose name i forget
<azonenberg> glade is the only one i found intuitive enough to actually use
<azonenberg> alliance? Its a pain
<berndj> yes, alliance
<berndj> looked potentially very pretty, but it gave me the same emotional experience vi did when i first met it
<berndj> (i've since made friends with vi)
<azonenberg> lol
<berndj> magic is kinda old-school; the gui is more like a convenience, rather than the primary interface
<azonenberg> yeah
<azonenberg> Glade looks like it could be a really nice tool
<azonenberg> If only it didnt segfault so much :P
<berndj> it's very strongly focused on its command line, but of course there are sensible gui action mappings
<berndj> oh, glade is free as in beer but not speech?  that'd be why i never saw it / checked it out
<azonenberg> berndj: Yes
<azonenberg> Source would be nice
<azonenberg> But its a step in the right direction compared to, say, synopsys
<wolfspraul> azonenberg: have you heard about the Fedora Electronics Lab Chitlesh Goorah was maintaining for a while?
<wolfspraul> the goal of that project was to bring together good IC design related free software
<wolfspraul> he has slowed down a bit since early this year, but the project is still out there
<wolfspraul> oh right, he calls it 'Free Electronics Lab' now because he is moving away from Fedora dependence and wants to also support RedHat Linux I think
<wolfspraul> here's a list of software in FEL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/FEL/list.html
<wolfspraul> and Chitlesh's blog http://chitlesh.wordpress.com/
<azonenberg> wolfspraul: back
<azonenberg> and nice
<azonenberg> wolfspraul: Did you see my pics from today's lab session? Made a tungsten probe tip with a ~1500nm point radius
<azonenberg> http://colossus.cs.rpi.edu/~azonenberg/images/homecmos/2011-06-22/, 910 and later (909 and before were misfiled and actually were a day or two ago)
<wolfspraul> I was planning to write a little eulogy on your beautiful pictures soon
<wolfspraul> so I haven't seen the 06-22 ones yet, but I really do like the series
<azonenberg> wolfspraul: Eulogy? Like a funeral speech?
<azonenberg> :p
<wolfspraul> I downloaded them all with wget -r :-)
<wolfspraul> ah sorry wrong word probably :-)
<wolfspraul> not a native speaker
<azonenberg> I figured as much
<wolfspraul> "eulogy is a speech or writing in praise of a person or thing, especially one recently deceased or retired"
<wolfspraul> :-)
<wolfspraul> I meant the first part...
<azonenberg> I see
<wolfspraul> no but seriously those pics are awesome
<azonenberg> well, any analysis or constructive criticism is welcome
<wolfspraul> I like to open up a process and make it interesting for people to peek into your lab
<azonenberg> You have my lab notes, you have the photos
<azonenberg> the more interesting you can make it sound, the better
<azonenberg> more people interested = more people providing suggestions and maybe running experiments too
<wolfspraul> I only have a small audience of maybe a few hundred people that really listen to me, but I will try to get my amazement at your work across to them...
<azonenberg> no worries
<azonenberg> Just dont expect the awesome to stop any time soon lol
<azonenberg> I'll be popping these probes and some previous dies under a SEM in the near future to get some close-ups
<azonenberg> and hopefully help diagnose my hardmask troubles a little better
<azonenberg> hi R0b0t1
<R0b0t1> Hello.
<R0b0t1> I now idle here :3
<R0b0t1> I'd be happy to join in, but it would seem I first need a microscope (and some money for wafers).
<azonenberg> As of now i'm the only one doing fab, though B0101 plans to start up a lab soon
<azonenberg> The rest are just providing useful suggestions
<azonenberg> I hope that will change eventually, we're trying to get more people involved
<R0b0t1> :D
<lekernel> excellent pics indeed
<bart416> that looks pretty good indeed
<azonenberg> lekernel: That one was showing the last few problems with my exposure system
<azonenberg> Notice the uneven lighting
<azonenberg> I think i will need a double exposure to get something etchable out of that
<azonenberg> But it's pretty close
<azonenberg> The issue i am having now is getting good yields with the hardmask
<azonenberg> Wet etching fails due to HF permeating my photoresist (longer hardbake may help there so I am not giving up entirely, I may also want to try another resist)
<azonenberg> And liftoff is proving difficult to get good yield with
<azonenberg> Partly because the solvent in the hardmask solution slowly attacks photoresist and therefore needs to be coated very quickly to prevent damage
<bart416> azonenberg,
<bart416> <leeeeee> Google translated page direct link .. http://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=en&prev=/search%3Fq%3Dbomba-de-difusion-en-acero-inoxidable%26hl%3Den%26ie%3DUTF-8%26prmd%3Divns&rurl=translate.google.com&sl=es&u=http://sites.google.com/site/skygaps/vacio/bomba-de-difusion-en-acero-inoxidable&usg=ALkJrhgSsKU-BZat30dCZq4YsnMl0XrtrQ
<bart416> ^just in ##electronics
<azonenberg> I'd be using high vacuum oil, not mercury
<azonenberg> But it looks quite interesting
<R0b0t1> J/w does ##electronics have some odd flags set on it? I can rarely ever join, although that might (for some reason) partially be my client.
<azonenberg> You have to be identified with nickserv before joining
<R0b0t1> Yeah... I finally got in. Dunno what's up *shrug*