cfbolz changed the topic of #pypy to: PyPy, the flexible snake (IRC logs: https://quodlibet.duckdns.org/irc/pypy/latest.log.html#irc-end ) | use cffi for calling C | if a pep adds a mere 25-30 [C-API] functions or so, it's a drop in the ocean (cough) - Armin
<LarstiQ>
good will -> goodwill. `It is based off PyPy 3.6`, might be me but `based off of` feels more correct. One paragraph later there is `are based on` fwiw.
<LarstiQ>
`We recommend using CFFI rather than c-extensions to interact with C`, is there maybe a link to the reasons why? I'm already convinced but others may not be
<LarstiQ>
`A new contributor took us up on the challenge to get windows 64-bit support.`, mention their name/point to the work?
<LarstiQ>
mattip: that's it for what stands out to me
<mattip>
if someone with a mac could try that out it would be nice
<mattip>
I will probably merge the changes anyway, and resync default pypy/rpython/rlib/rvmprof
<LarstiQ>
> < mattip> I didn't want to call out the contributor by name, because so far all we know is their heptapod handle
<LarstiQ>
right
oberstet has joined #pypy
<LarstiQ>
I appear in some changelogs just by handle and that's fine by me (and in one project had a contributor who specifically didn't want their realname used).
<LarstiQ>
and some people don't appreciate the attention either way