04:05 <GitHub171> [artiq] sbourdeauducq commented on issue #908: That's what I thought - the patch below works around the problem.... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/908#issuecomment-363650534

04:12 <GitHub59> [smoltcp] LuoZijun reopened pull request #136: rewrite ::phy::raw_socket (master...patch-3) https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/136

04:18 <GitHub85> [smoltcp] LuoZijun commented on issue #136: Back with `Restore branch` :) https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/136#issuecomment-363652558

04:27 <GitHub32> [artiq] sbourdeauducq pushed 1 new commit to master: https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/commit/2d4a1340ea3a25dbaaa2200b7e86d2f42e7a19b5

04:27 <GitHub32> artiq/master 2d4a134 Sebastien Bourdeauducq: sayma_amc: remove RTM bitstream upload core. Closes #908

04:27 <GitHub13> [artiq] sbourdeauducq closed issue #908: Sayma MiSoC memory test failed https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/908

04:28 <GitHub193> [artiq] sbourdeauducq commented on issue #813: https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/908#issuecomment-363650534 https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/813#issuecomment-363653816

04:51 <GitHub140> [artiq] sbourdeauducq commented on issue #854: @gkasprow @marmeladapk Have you been able to receive packets by tweaking the RX clock phase? https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/854#issuecomment-363656609

04:57 <bb-m-labs> build #1188 of artiq-board is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq-board/builds/1188

05:04 <bb-m-labs> build #718 of artiq-win64-test is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq-win64-test/builds/718

05:08 <bb-m-labs> build #2034 of artiq is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq/builds/2034

06:57 <GitHub21> [artiq] mingshenli opened issue #916: Software can not be installed https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/916

06:58 <GitHub3> [artiq] mingshenli closed issue #916: Software can not be installed https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/916

07:00 <sb0> _florent_, sending the report soon. anything you want to say?

07:42 <GitHub35> [artiq] mingshenli opened issue #917: the artiq_flash exits with error https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/917

08:02 <GitHub26> [artiq] sbourdeauducq commented on issue #813: Note: my SAWG test (cb0016ceeeaa0e376a9b13ab5d2ea7ba7495100b) actually did include this core, so it may be possible to still make it work. https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/813#issuecomment-363687304

08:03 <GitHub79> [artiq] sbourdeauducq commented on issue #917: What ARTIQ version? https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/917#issuecomment-363687510

10:43 <GitHub90> [artiq] marmeladapk commented on issue #854: @sbourdeauducq No, we'll try now with TEMAC ipcore. https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/854#issuecomment-363729558

11:22 <GitHub135> [artiq] sbourdeauducq commented on issue #854: I believe it is close to working with the ARTIQ code and that TEMAC should not be used at this point.... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/854#issuecomment-363739372

11:24 <GitHub80> [artiq] sbourdeauducq commented on issue #854: Did you mean "no we haven't tried" or "no it did not work"? https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/854#issuecomment-363739793

11:28 <GitHub114> [artiq] marmeladapk commented on issue #854: @sbourdeauducq It didn't work. Just to be sure, I'll post what I've done:... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/854#issuecomment-363740609

11:28 <GitHub22> [artiq] marmeladapk commented on issue #854: @sbourdeauducq It didn't work. Just to be sure, I'll post what I've done:... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/854#issuecomment-363740609

11:31 <GitHub38> [artiq] marmeladapk commented on issue #854: @sbourdeauducq It didn't work. Just to be sure, I'll post what I've done:... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/854#issuecomment-363740609

11:31 <GitHub162> [artiq] sbourdeauducq commented on issue #854: Strange. By the way for faster cycles you can simply do ``openocd -f <path_to>/sayma.cfg -c "pld load 1 top_0225.bit; exit"``, no need to flash the bitstreams. https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/854#issuecomment-363741386

11:32 <GitHub197> [artiq] sbourdeauducq commented on issue #854: And you always got a "preamble error" for every packet?... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/854#issuecomment-363741386

12:11 <GitHub62> [artiq] mingshenli commented on issue #917: it is 3.2... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/917#issuecomment-363750233

12:12 <GitHub26> [artiq] mingshenli commented on issue #917: it is 3.2... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/917#issuecomment-363750233

12:21 <GitHub8> [artiq] gkasprow commented on issue #854: @sbourdeauducq we test it on same board I observed working RGMII with chipscope and IPBUS core that transmitted packets. PHY configuration is the same. That's why we decided to implement Xilinx MAC and do long term tests to be sure that what I observe with single packets is not some kind of coincidence. https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/854#issuecomment-363752342

14:10 <GitHub140> [smoltcp] phil-opp commented on issue #140: @whitequark I addressed your comments and added tests. https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/140#issuecomment-363779870

14:34 <GitHub0> [artiq] jordens commented on issue #917: You need to manually install openocd-0.10.0-1 or wait for 3.5 to do that for you. https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/917#issuecomment-363787257

14:34 <GitHub199> [artiq] jordens commented on issue #917: You need to manually install openocd-0.10.0-1 or wait for 3.5 to do that for you.... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/917#issuecomment-363787257

14:34 <GitHub149> [artiq] jordens closed issue #917: the artiq_flash exits with error https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/917

14:37 <GitHub44> [artiq] jordens closed issue #913: artiq_flash exits with "Error: Unknown flash device (ID 0x00ffffff)" https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/913

14:37 <GitHub196> [artiq] jordens commented on issue #913: You need to manually install openocd-0.10.0-1 or wait for 3.5 to do that for you.... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/913#issuecomment-363788066

15:07 <GitHub119> [smoltcp] dlrobertson opened pull request #155: Add tests for ipv6 in wire::ip (master...add_tests) https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/155

15:13 <GitHub75> [artiq] jordens commented on issue #915: The windows test is not installing the artiq version that the build is running for http://buildbot.m-labs.hk/builders/artiq-win64-test/builds/718/steps/conda_create/logs/stdio... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/915#issuecomment-363799584

15:14 <GitHub146> [artiq] sbourdeauducq commented on issue #915: I believe the clean solution is a) fix the buildbot b) do the build of binutils-or1k-linux 2.27 that wasn't done for Windows. https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/915#issuecomment-363800128

16:10 <GitHub106> [smoltcp] dlrobertson closed issue #137: poll_at returns the time left to call poll instead of the timestamp at which to call poll https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/issues/137

16:48 <GitHub49> [smoltcp] phil-opp commented on issue #75: Added tests and rebased on top of master. I try to add the method documentation soon. https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/pull/75#issuecomment-363832508

18:38 <GitHub188> [artiq] jonaskeller commented on issue #902: I'm afraid I just checked with 3.3+3.gb92b00a1 (can't test with 3.4 yet due to #915) and still saw a panic after <1h, with a pretty similar looking backtrace:... https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/902#issuecomment-363867083

22:18 <GitHub9> [sinara] gkasprow pushed 2 new commits to master: https://git.io/vAJNH

22:18 <GitHub9> sinara/master 1f504f0 Greg: Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/m-labs/sinara

22:18 <GitHub9> sinara/master bbb4752 Greg: added BOM files, closing #509

22:47 <GitHub88> [smoltcp] LuoZijun closed issue #144: Add function `netmask()` and `broadcast` on Ipv4Cidr/Ipv6Cidr ? https://github.com/m-labs/smoltcp/issues/144