05:49 <kares> headius: jossl can not work without BC much - well some parts could such as ssl if we try hard

05:50 <kares> but if I was also hoping to try moving to BC ssl impl which might allow us more compatibility with some APIs we can not provide atm

05:51 <kares> not that I am planning to work on it that much - could be switched in latest release with a property flag

05:52 <kares> basically even BC is just jar dependencies jossl needs - no (security, net.ssl) provider installation is necessary

05:53 <kares> enebo: go for it - or let me know if you need help. no ar-jdbc fixes/commits in my pocket ...

13:09 <enebo> kares: I put out 52.0 last week but I did not review whether we should do 50.x or 51.x releases

13:09 <enebo> kares: multiple reports of people pointing at github and hitting build issues and one person offline contacted me saying they were evaluating jruby for a rails 5.2 project

13:10 <enebo> kares: actual AR test errors is reasonably good