<Joerg-Neo900>
long story truncated: until e.g. Neo900 could even start to ponder usingf that leete new chip, usually a 3 to 7 years will pass by after initial press release announcement of the chip
<Joerg-Neo900>
and 5G they don't even have the protocol specs settled and prettyprinted, so nobody within a sane mind would star developing a massmarket-targeted chip for it
<Joerg-Neo900>
start*
<Joerg-Neo900>
hi houkime
<houkime>
hi joerg. Long time no see. Checking irclog you had a bad time(
<Joerg-Neo900>
houkime: you should provide a "clean" layout placement draft so the product devs and circuit design engineers (werner, me) can review and catch the inferred 5 lacking special placement notes for a few sensors etc. Werner and me tried hard to add all that metainfo into the whitepapers and the schematics in "NOTE:"s, but probably we missed a few
<houkime>
What exactly do you mean by "clean"?
<Joerg-Neo900>
I didn't look into any placement files yet, so maybe they are already existing and "clean" and I'm just not aware. Anyway either way we need a few hours "interactive" chat with you Werner me to make sure we're on same page with all that stuff
<Joerg-Neo900>
>>What exactly do you mean by "clean"?<< noting special, that's why I placed it in "ticks". Just needs to be appropriate document so werner and me can understand what you're doing regarding placement
<Joerg-Neo900>
afk
<houkime>
ok. I guess then it needs to be a documentation regarding reasoning behind placing components one way and not another.
<houkime>
I thought about writing stuff this summer but never got to it evidently. My bad.
infobot has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
<houkime>
There're multiple .fods tables with placement calculations though they don't cover or explain everything.
user__ has joined #neo900
<Joerg-Neo900>
hey, don't you think this is a tad over the top documetation wide? for pretty much 90+% of components, placment is trivial, for another 5% it's self evident
<Joerg-Neo900>
unless some placement consideration has impact to *all* at once, in which case whe should have had this chat much earlier. So let's hope this won't bite our rear
<Joerg-Neo900>
wise*
infobot has joined #neo900
preview has joined #neo900
houkime has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
preview has quit [Quit: preview]
ArturSha1 has joined #neo900
l_bratch has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
preview has joined #neo900
paulk-leonov has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]
paulk-leonov has joined #neo900
wiewo has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]
wiewo has joined #neo900
_Chris_ has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
houkime has joined #neo900
preview has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
preview has joined #neo900
<houkime>
right now there is placement itself (kicad pcb file) which is missing stuff on the upper (mainly because display connector esd protection was geometrically not feasible with parts that are in sch), fods calculations and issues in notabug repository that cover current and some past challenges and considerations.
houkime has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
houkime has joined #neo900
houkime has quit [Remote host closed the connection]