VitamineD has joined #nanoc
VitamineD has quit [Quit: VitamineD]
VitamineD has joined #nanoc
yogsototh has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
yogsototh has joined #nanoc
pavelkunc has joined #nanoc
jarr0dsz has joined #nanoc
VitamineD has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]
jugglinmike has joined #nanoc
jarr0dsz has quit [Quit: My MacBook has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]
VitamineD has joined #nanoc
tantalum has joined #nanoc
VitamineD has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]
alerante has quit []
VitamineD has joined #nanoc
cDlm has joined #nanoc
VitamineD has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
cDlm is now known as VitamineD
jarr0dsz has joined #nanoc
jarr0dsz has quit [Max SendQ exceeded]
jarr0dsz has joined #nanoc
jarr0dsz has quit [Max SendQ exceeded]
jarr0dsz has joined #nanoc
cDlm has joined #nanoc
VitamineD has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]
cDlm is now known as VitamineD
VitamineD has quit [Quit: VitamineD]
johnmendo has joined #nanoc
<
johnmendo>
Are there any specific use cases where you think middle man works better?
jarr0dsz has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
johnmendo has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]
ics has quit [Quit: My MacBook Pro has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]
ics has joined #nanoc
VitamineD has joined #nanoc
johnmendo has joined #nanoc
pavelkunc has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
pavelkunc has joined #nanoc
tantalum has left #nanoc [#nanoc]
feliciaan has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
_rgn has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
<
bobthecow>
ddfreyne: want me to merge those PRs or just :+1: them?
_rgn_ has joined #nanoc
_rgn_ is now known as _rgn
_rgn is now known as _rg
_rg is now known as _rgn
feliciaan has joined #nanoc
johnmendo has quit [Quit: Leaving]
feliciaan has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
feliciaan has joined #nanoc
VitamineD has quit [Quit: VitamineD]
pavelkunc has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
<
ddfreyne>
bobthecow: I think it is better to just :+1: the stuff that you agree with
<
ddfreyne>
bobthecow: and let the original author do the merge
<
ddfreyne>
bobthecow: (at least, if the original author has commit access)
<
bobthecow>
fair enough.
<
ddfreyne>
bobthecow: That is the way I learn to work at SoundCloud :P
<
bobthecow>
soundcloud has the original author merge it?
<
ddfreyne>
After a :+1:
<
ddfreyne>
It makes sense, because the original author now also has the responsibility of fixing things that break in master
<
bobthecow>
at my last company someone besides the +1 and the original author had to merge things.
<
bobthecow>
i guess to guarantee that at least two other people had a chance to look at things, even if they didn't :)
<
ddfreyne>
bobthecow: Two +1s are usually OK
bghost has joined #nanoc
<
bobthecow>
for us, "never deploy your own code" slowed things down just enough to keep stupid from happening (very often)
bghost has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
<
ddfreyne>
bobthecow: I don't think people really deploy their code on their own. There's always somebody else around
<
ddfreyne>
+ this way of working has never had negative consequences AFAICT
ddfreyne_ has joined #nanoc