00:40 <sb0> yeah, gtkwave patches do get merged quickly ime

00:40 <sb0> writing the patch may give you a headache though, the code is somewhat hairy

00:41 <sb0> (unless it's something trivial)

15:24 <whitequark> sb0: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-June/100838.html

15:27 <whitequark> if we use that we get python generators *almost* for free

16:53 <sb0___> whitequark: isn't the compiler supposed to support dynamic list sizes?

16:53 <sb0___> e.g. l = [0]*len(other_list)

16:54 <whitequark> it is

16:54 <whitequark> what does it tell you?

16:55 <sb0___> [0]*int(len(other_list)) appears to work

16:56 <sb0___> ERROR:worker(11860,bd_scan_test_2_cleaned.py):root:While compiling <repository>\ magtrap\bd_scan_test_2_cleaned.py <repository>\magtrap\bd_scan_test_2_cleaned.py:52:21-52:22: error: expected '*' operands to be a list and an integer in this context counts = [0]*len(frequencies) ~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ <repository>\magtrap\bd_scan_test_2_cleaned.py:52:18-52:21: note: list operand o f type list(elt=int(width='a))

16:56 <sb0___> ew

16:56 <sb0___> http://paste.debian.net/731389/

16:59 <larsc> sb0___: how is the jesd stuff coming along?

17:00 <sb0___> _florent_: ^

17:04 <_florent_> larsc/sb0___: slowly for now, I'm going to work full time on it soon

17:05 <larsc> _florent_: ok.

17:09 <larsc> If you have any questions let me know, I had to (at least try to) comprehend the spec last week

17:12 <whitequark> sb0___: ok I see

17:12 <whitequark> it's a problem with the typechecker. please file an issue with complete source

17:12 <whitequark> should be trivial to fix

17:13 <whitequark> (but it's hard to trigger)

17:24 <whitequark> oh

17:24 <whitequark> oh, it's not hard to trigger, it was just never tested in embedding

18:08 <larsc> does anybody have a skylake system? I'm seeing this stange issue with Vivado crashing on skylake based systems. Identical software setup with other old chipsets works fine, quite strange

21:49 <_florent_> larsc: ok thanks, I'll ask you if I have questions