Taaus changed the topic of #ocaml to: http://caml.inria.fr/oreilly-book/
engstad has joined #ocaml
engstad has quit ["Leaving"]
gl has quit [Read error: 113 (No route to host)]
gl has joined #ocaml
samx has quit [Remote closed the connection]
smkl has quit [Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)]
samx has joined #ocaml
smkl has joined #ocaml
Dieb has joined #ocaml
yangsx has joined #ocaml
gene9 has joined #ocaml
gene9 has quit [Client Quit]
malc has joined #ocaml
* gl is away: work in progress..
yangsx has quit ["Client Exiting"]
gl has quit [Read error: 113 (No route to host)]
gl has joined #ocaml
malc has quit ["no reason"]
yangsx has joined #ocaml
yangsx has quit ["Client Exiting"]
gl has quit [Read error: 113 (No route to host)]
gl has joined #ocaml
Demitar has joined #ocaml
kjs3 has joined #ocaml
gl has quit [Read error: 113 (No route to host)]
Demitar has quit []
kjs3 has quit [Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)]
<timmy> if i compile with ocamlc -thread, and i have two threads that want to use a common queue, i don't have to worry about using a mutex or something because the queue is thread safe?
<samx> i kind of doubt the data structures would be thread safe
<samx> i may be wrong
<samx> ...and looking at the queue.ml source, i don't really see anything dealing with threads there, so i'd use a mutex at least
<timmy> ok thanks
Demitar has joined #ocaml
Demitar has quit []
Demitar has joined #ocaml
Yurik has quit [Read error: 113 (No route to host)]
samx has quit [Remote closed the connection]
Demitar has quit []