11:59 <rhombus> DocScrutinizer05: Sorry I ducked out so quickly yesterday. I was at work and had to leave.

12:15 <rhombus> DocScrutinizer05: I hear your call for manpower. How many hours per week would be of use to you?

13:56 <Joerg-Neo900> every minute helps

14:20 <rhombus> Joerg-Neo900: How can I contact you directly?

14:51 <Joerg-Neo900> see PM

16:01 <Joerg-Neo900> /topic

16:01 <Joerg-Neo900> rhombus: >>http://neo900.org | CCCAMP15 lightning talks at http://neo900.org/stuff/cccamp15/ - major: http://neo900.org/stuff/cccamp15/ccc2015talk/neo900-wpwrak_CCC2015.webm | conversations are logged to http://infobot.rikers.org/%23neo900/ and http://irclog.whitequark.org/neo900<<

16:58 <Joerg-Neo900> re "who's responsible for soldering": http://lists.goldelico.com/pipermail/community/2017-March/001606.html

17:00 <Joerg-Neo900> the original 'deal' was that fab (global components) warrants yield - iirc. However such warranty is always a subject to investigation whose fault it is when something doesn't work as expected

17:06 <Joerg-Neo900> of course the fab claims "you're using a different brand of PoP RAM, so that's the reason why we can't solder it anymore". I have a hard time buying that explanation, since the PoP chips don't differ in termal properies, also they all are totally rigid as far as relevant to warp issue. Actually we think it's the process they can't exactly duplicate from when they did last time, with different personal and machines

20:40 <enyc> Joerg-Neo900: uugh frustrating