00:04 <ravelo> I think it would still be better to make some tests to be sure that it works good enough in the end

00:05 <ravelo> maybe together with Nikolaus

00:33 <Joerg-Neo900> ravelo: the problems Nikoluas sees are yield problems and are specific to the PCB and process he uses. And he attributes the problems on lower side pf OMAP to a RAM chip on upper side. Which test could I possibly do before I have a PCB specific for Neo900 to make anything sure?

00:34 <Joerg-Neo900> I mused about it already and I couldn't come up with anything reasonable so far

00:35 <Joerg-Neo900> am I worried? Of course. Could I change anything? Only by keeping the issue in mind and keeping an eye on it in all further negotiations and plans

00:40 <ravelo> ok

01:07 <Joerg-Neo900> I possibly could get more micron chips like the ones Nikolaus said did work for his GTA04. But that wouldn't help compensate for the financial loss he most likely already suffered from the poor yield and low safety margin he used for his calculations

01:09 <Joerg-Neo900> Neo900 OTOH has 1GB RAM as a much asked for key feature, and we use *exactly* same chips Nokia used in N9, so I don't see any immutable immanent problems here. after all Nokia manufactured a few millions of N9 and I guess they didn't accept such poor yield

01:10 <Joerg-Neo900> Bottom line: I am less worried than Nikolaus seems to be, but his worries just add to my already unbearbly high stress level