<ddfreyne>
I didn’t pay much attention to the home page, because that’ll be redone soon.
<guardian>
o/
pkunc has joined #nanoc
pkunc1 has joined #nanoc
pkunc has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]
cDlm has quit [Quit: mi dormas]
cDlm has joined #nanoc
pkunc1 has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
<guardian>
I never used liquid templates
<guardian>
but that pipe thing looks appealing
<guardian>
are you guys using it? so far my nanoc sites are: items filtered by :erb first, then by extension (e.g. .md files go through :kramdown) and layout is haml
pkunc has joined #nanoc
<ddfreyne>
guardian: Liquid is designed to be safe, and so it takes a bit of work to get it cooperating with nanoc properly
<ddfreyne>
guardian: I find that Mustache/Handlebars is usually nicer
pkunc has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
<guardian>
are there nanoc filters for mustache / handlebars?
<guardian>
and e.g. currently I'm doing
<guardian>
<%= image('full_transliteration_example', :align => :center, :caption => 'Transliteration of a Pinyin input') %>
<guardian>
what would I save? replacing <%= with {{ ?
pkunc has joined #nanoc
pkunc has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
pkunc has joined #nanoc
pkunc has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
jugglinmike has joined #nanoc
<ddfreyne>
guardian: I prefer ERB. It’s more flexible.
<ddfreyne>
Mustache/Handlebars is a little bit prettier, but meh
<guardian>
k
<guardian>
thanks for sharing your views
matthieu_m has joined #nanoc
pkunc has joined #nanoc
matthieu_m has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]
<guardian>
ddfreyne: is the nanoc-4 trello board still valid?
matthieu_m has joined #nanoc
cDlm has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
pkunc has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
VitamineD has joined #nanoc
pkunc has joined #nanoc
pkunc has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]
<ddfreyne>
guardian: Nope. I am figuring out how to archive it, but it doesn’t seem trivial
<ddfreyne>
guardian: I’m not sure I like Trello all that much for this
pkunc has joined #nanoc
pkunc has quit [Client Quit]
matthieu_m has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
<guardian>
ddfreyne: yeah I'm hesitating for a while for my pet projects... some of them were done with trac: 1. open feature request -> 2. implement -> 3. commit and reference ticket
<guardian>
ddfreyne: but maybe that's just overkill and a waste of time
<guardian>
ddfreyne: trello or anything alike looks simpler at first, but well I'm not sur I'll be efficient with it either
<ddfreyne>
guardian: I’m not sure what I’ll use to collect ideas. I started https://github.com/nanoc/rfcs but I doubt it will be super useful.
<ddfreyne>
It is a lot of overhead.
<guardian>
yeah
<guardian>
in my trac setup, I have a wiki page called "References" where I put references to articles of interest for that project. With a summary of what's to take away from each article
<guardian>
but retrospectively it takes time to do
<guardian>
and now abandonning it... feels like... well a bad idea despite being able to objectively identify it's a time sucker
<guardian>
:)
<nanoc-gh>
[nanoc] ddfreyne created check-bundler-presence (+1 new commit): http://git.io/vL4fU
<nanoc-gh>
nanoc/check-bundler-presence 11c6201 Denis Defreyne: Check for Gemfile
matthieu_m has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
<nanoc-gh>
[nanoc] ddfreyne pushed 2 new commits to simplify-rakefile: http://git.io/vL4YW