00:31 <naobsd> oh, it looks like here is "development discussion" room :)

00:37 <mrueg> heh

01:11 <srao> chromium.org gerrit server

13:41 <mmind00> dianders: I've looked at the 5 patches you referenced in the mail ... for me it's definitly ok to leave the regulator simply running for now ... on the two cortex-a9 boards we do the same, simply because we don't have enough control over their users to let them get disabled

15:05 <dianders> karlp: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/#/c/210066/ is the end of the chain. I'm planning to post them to mailing list soon but wanted Heiko's early feedback.

15:06 <dianders> mmind00: OK, great! TY for looking at them.

15:07 <karlp> dianders: thanks, I got to gerring.chromium.org, but it was not what I was looking for

15:07 <mmind00> dianders: btw why did you split patches 1+2 and 4+5?

15:08 <dianders> mmind00: I thought that there might be issues with either EHCI or DWC2 so thought it would be nice to apply one but not the other

15:09 <dianders> karlp: Let me know if you can't find all 5 patches. I know gerrit can be persnickety sometimes and now show dependency chains.

15:36 <karlp> found them, but yeah, gerrit is.... wonderful

15:36 <karlp> just following along at this point, soaking the brane