ec changed the topic of #elliottcable to: a π•―π–Šπ–“ 𝖔𝖋 π•―π–Šπ–™π–Šπ–—π–’π–Žπ–“π–Šπ–‰ π•―π–†π–’π–˜π–Šπ–‘π–˜ slash sΝ”ΜžuΝ•Ν™pΝ™Ν“e̜̺rΜΌΜ¦i̼̜oΜ–Μ¬rΜ™Μ™ c̝͉α»₯Μ§Ν˜αΈ·Μ‘Ν™Ε£Ν“Μ€ || #ELLIOTTCABLE is not about ELLIOTTCABLE
Sgeo has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
Sgeo has joined #elliottcable
mylesborins has quit [Quit: farewell for now]
mylesborins has joined #elliottcable
<ELLIOTTCABLE> I mean, really depends how you define it Β―\_(ツ)_/Β―
<ELLIOTTCABLE> if you're being pedantic β€” no. (1. not integrated into the language; written in a separate codebase; 2. no hygienicity.)
<ELLIOTTCABLE> wait, super confused
<ELLIOTTCABLE> just googled Scala code
<ELLIOTTCABLE> does it even *use* pattern-matching
<ELLIOTTCABLE> I don't see any pattern clauses …
<ELLIOTTCABLE> oh, found a GADT example
<ELLIOTTCABLE> wow, can't imagine how you prefer this, but. each to their own. :P
<ELLIOTTCABLE> again, the code linked is *abusing* OCaml's lexer for entirely unrelated meaning
<ELLIOTTCABLE> i.e. `| '#', Compl '|'` would be meaningless / parse-error outside of that ppx
<ELLIOTTCABLE> but this is … very bad, at least to me :x
<jfhbrook> match/case ELLIOTTCABLE
<jfhbrook> oh yeah you found it