DocScrutinizer05 changed the topic of #qi-hardware to: Copyleft hardware - http://qi-hardware.com | hardware hackers join here to discuss Ben NanoNote, atben / atusb 802.15.4 wireless, and other community driven hw projects | public logging at http://en.qi-hardware.com/irclogs and http://irclog.whitequark.org/qi-hardware
<wpwrak> this sort of critter would be more DocScrutinizer05's domain
<wpwrak> for me, anything > 12 V is "dangerously high voltage" :)
<whitequark> wait until you hear about the 3MHz 12kV part of that power supply ;p
<whitequark> oddly, it was easier to figure out, though the feedthroughs are going to leave me broke
<wpwrak> i think your design has to include tachyons in pi^e-dimensional brane-color space. plenty of them. else, it's obvious you're not serious.
<DocScrutinizer05> cascode ladder
<DocScrutinizer05> 1..2kV no problem
<DocScrutinizer05> see wiki cascode
<DocScrutinizer05> note the design requirements! e.g. R5 needs to deal with max voltage
<DocScrutinizer05> 2kV is easily manageable though
<DocScrutinizer05> whitequark: ^^^
<DocScrutinizer05> for the DC supply I actually would suggest villard
<whitequark> hmmmm, interesting
<whitequark> that makes sense
<whitequark> a bit complicated though
<whitequark> maybe I should go the custom transformer route after all. soak the windings in oil
<DocScrutinizer05> well, your signal you need has some unusual requirements
<whitequark> that's true
<DocScrutinizer05> transformer will gove you a zoo of stuff but no sawtooth
<DocScrutinizer05> give*
<DocScrutinizer05> Wattage? aka impedance of load?
<whitequark> 50pF capacitor essentially
<DocScrutinizer05> lol
<DocScrutinizer05> you get that build on half a eurocard
<DocScrutinizer05> maybe a creditcard size PCB
<DocScrutinizer05> I'd dare to build it on a stamp
<whitequark> heh
<whitequark> hm
<DocScrutinizer05> high voltage isn't per se a problem
<whitequark> should I do just the villard cascade from supply voltage (20V, so, seven stages)?
<whitequark> or raise it to 200V
<DocScrutinizer05> and 2kV isn't even high volatge at all
<whitequark> or something like that via a transformer first?
<whitequark> I'm thinking the latter based on some simluations I did
<DocScrutinizer05> I'd use a boost and then a villard
<DocScrutinizer05> you can get up to 200V from a booster
<DocScrutinizer05> seven stages?
<whitequark> 20->2000 needs 100x
<DocScrutinizer05> 7 * 20V is not 2kV in my book
<whitequark> hm
<whitequark> doesn't each stage double the voltage?
<DocScrutinizer05> 2ooV booster and then a 11 stage villard
<DocScrutinizer05> nope
<whitequark> oh, that would explain a few things
<DocScrutinizer05> villard adds Vin for each stage
<DocScrutinizer05> that's why you use same capacitors all the way through ;-)
<whitequark> yes, that's what I wondered about
<DocScrutinizer05> gotta finally find something to eat in this shitty village
<DocScrutinizer05> bbl
atommann has joined #qi-hardware
FDCX has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
<DocScrutinizer05> or instead of a booster use a "balun" type 1:10 transformer, and two transistors
<DocScrutinizer05> prolly one of the tiniest "active" circuits I know of
<whitequark> yes, that's what I was thinking of
<whitequark> could really just use that CCFL transformer, it's like $1
<whitequark> and I get to use one villard stage rather than eleven
<DocScrutinizer05> sure. could do that. just doesn't make your life any easier, you need 2kV diodes then ;-P
<whitequark> Unit Price USD 0.06840
<whitequark> not exactly an issue
<DocScrutinizer05> in bthe end you'll end with somthing that has 5 diodes in series, plus birdseed to make them work when in series, and that will look damn similar to villard
<DocScrutinizer05> then come the capacitors ;-P
<whitequark> hmmm right, I wonder how fat should they be
<whitequark> 1nF@2kV is trivial
<whitequark> seems enough for my purpose...
<DocScrutinizer05> what the heck became of diodes and transistors during last 30 some years?
<DocScrutinizer05> anyway SMT and high voltage doesn't go together well. That diode has an isolation gap of <4mm. Sounds scary for a 2kV
<DocScrutinizer05> and ideally you should use a graetz bridge. A flyback diode if you feel lucky and don't worry about efficacy
<eintopf> hi
<DocScrutinizer05> also you know that output voltage of those CCFL critters is absolutely not stabilized or warranted in any way? It may be 5 times overvoltage without rated load
<DocScrutinizer05> maybe more
FDCX has joined #qi-hardware
<DocScrutinizer05> either you want to stabilize the 2kV DC with a simple secondary->primary feedback, or you dimension your cascode ladder so it can cope with whatever your power supply feeds to it, and you use a feedback from output to control input there
<DocScrutinizer05> I'd suggest the latter since you want it anyway to get a clean signal at output
<DocScrutinizer05> anyway make sure your CCFL booster is at least specified to survive operation without rated load
<DocScrutinizer05> for sec->primary feedback don't fall for the idea I just had for 3 seconds: abusing the cascode basis voltage divider. The cascode introduces massive load to that one, it's not stable
<DocScrutinizer05> you need a dedicated high-Z R-divider sth 10:1 or 20:2 and an according 100..200V Zener
<DocScrutinizer05> you could build a somewhat decent lod for your CCFL booster with that divider as well
<DocScrutinizer05> load*
<DocScrutinizer05> you don't want "floating" outputs with undefined or zero load when it komes to kV
<DocScrutinizer05> comes*
<DocScrutinizer05> ((output voltage of those CCFL critters is absolutely not stabilized)) that's actually by design, they are meant to provide a certain current or a certan power, depending on what you want them for. Neon is constant current, FL is constant power
atommann has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
atommann has joined #qi-hardware
jluis has joined #qi-hardware
wej_ has joined #qi-hardware
wej has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
wolfspraul has joined #qi-hardware
wej has joined #qi-hardware
wej_ has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
rodgort has quit [Quit: ERC Version 5.3 (IRC client for Emacs)]
rodgort has joined #qi-hardware
wolfspra1l has joined #qi-hardware
wolfspraul has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
wolfspra1l has quit [Client Quit]
wolfspraul has joined #qi-hardware
pcercuei has joined #qi-hardware
wolfspraul has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
wolfspraul has joined #qi-hardware
wolfspraul has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]
wolfspraul has joined #qi-hardware
xiangfu has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
atommann has quit [Quit: Leaving]
wej has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
wej has joined #qi-hardware
wej has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
wej has joined #qi-hardware
atommann has joined #qi-hardware
woakas1 has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
woakas1 has joined #qi-hardware
jluis has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
sb0 has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
sb0 has joined #qi-hardware
<whitequark> DocScrutinizer05: ah I see, thanks
<whitequark> I was going to surround it with an overall feedback loop
<DocScrutinizer05> feedback sawtooth to 220V input of CCFL converter?
<DocScrutinizer05> ;-)
<whitequark> feed the primary with voltage-controlled PWM from opamp output. feedback from divider to - input, filtered PWM from controller via optical isolation to + input
<whitequark> divide it 1000:1
<DocScrutinizer05> you cannot "dim" those CCFL converters
<whitequark> no, not a CCFL converter
<whitequark> a CCFL *transformer*
<DocScrutinizer05> that's the same
<whitequark> how so?
<whitequark> it's just a regular transformer
<whitequark> I've seen the DS
<DocScrutinizer05> well, you cannot PWM a transformer, right?
<DocScrutinizer05> I mean it's meant to work with 50Hz sine wave
<whitequark> hm
<whitequark> I don't know how this mode of operation is called in english
<DocScrutinizer05> you can try to dim it with usual phase-end-enabling triac dimmer
<whitequark> ah, what I want to make is essentially a class D amp that feeds the primary
<DocScrutinizer05> but I strongly discourage that
<whitequark> what do you think of my class D amp feeding sine to trafo idea?
<whitequark> so, then it would have two feedback circuits. one to keep 2kV DC, another for the cascode ladder
<whitequark> DocScrutinizer05: anyway I already decided against using CCFL trafo
<whitequark> for the reasons you have listed above
<whitequark> but it applies just the same to the balun thing
<DocScrutinizer05> I'd use a simple on/of feedback for the Vdd, however you build it
<whitequark> hmmm, so feed it with fixed sine, then use a comparator to enable?
<whitequark> that makes sense
<DocScrutinizer05> yeah, and a triac/dimmer to only switch in zero crossing
<DocScrutinizer05> if you feed it with AC. Simple on7off for any balun-thing
<whitequark> talking about sine, do you think I could use the primary itself as half of LC filter, and feed the filter with rectangular pulses from a FET?
<whitequark> I don't have AC
<DocScrutinizer05> when you don't want to use the half-bridge balun-thing, you prolly want to go for a traditional SPSU primary side design
<DocScrutinizer05> using any chip of your choice made for that
<DocScrutinizer05> there are like a million to choose from
<DocScrutinizer05> I'd not build some unique homegrown solution for that
<DocScrutinizer05> we discussed that recently here, with err I forgot who planned to build a power supply for 12V or sth
<whitequark> hm, I never used any SPSUs with a trafo
<whitequark> only with an inductor
<DocScrutinizer05> add a second coil and you got a trafo
<whitequark> well yeah, that's essentially same thing as I want
<whitequark> could reuse an existing chip, maybe even with integrated FET
<whitequark> and feed it back via a bigger divider
<DocScrutinizer05> yep, exactly
<whitequark> for 200V should be simple
<whitequark> I think in computer PSUs they optically isolate the secondary from primary? not sure how to do that
<DocScrutinizer05> there are also pretty cheap 12V->220V-AC converters ready made out there
<whitequark> I mean, optically isolated feedback
<DocScrutinizer05> optocoupler
<whitequark> ah, no, I think it goes the other way
<whitequark> they only have FET on primary side and everything else is on secondary side
<whitequark> that makes it simpler
<whitequark> 100W
<DocScrutinizer05> overkill though
<whitequark> I don't even need 1W
<DocScrutinizer05> but supposed to be regulated and low-load-resilient
<whitequark> ehh, I'll do my own, it doesn't seem very hard
<whitequark> also will get SMPS experience :p
<whitequark> one more thing to debug, but it's not like I have a deadline
<DocScrutinizer05> fine then, taking pride in DIY is the right spirit ;-)
atommann has quit [Quit: Leaving]
DocAvalanche has joined #qi-hardware
DocScrutinizer51 has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
DocAvalanche has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
DocScrutinizer51 has joined #qi-hardware
pcercuei has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds]
<whitequark> DocScrutinizer05: I just realized one thing
<whitequark> you were saying you need to drive a trafo with sine
<whitequark> however an SMPS doesn't do that even nearly
<DocScrutinizer05> I said it's supposed to be powered by sine in your particular component
<DocScrutinizer05> when you don't use sine, you get differing results on behavior
<whitequark> ah, yes, I understand that
<whitequark> but does it really matter if I have feedback anyway?
<DocScrutinizer05> trafos and inductivities have a number of properties and those determine what you may and may not do with them and what are the results you see
<whitequark> as in, it will work in a drastically different mode than it is supposed to
<DocScrutinizer05> yes
<DocScrutinizer05> anyway, have to run
<whitequark> see you
<DocScrutinizer05> bbl
<whitequark> digikey links right away to this driver: http://www.digikey.com/product-detail/en/SN6501DBVR/296-37700-2-ND/3431175
<whitequark> oscillator and two FETs in convenient package
<whitequark> hm, 5V though
<whitequark> hm, it's completely useless for me
<whitequark> but, it gives me ideas
wolfspraul has quit [Quit: leaving]
zear has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]
kyak_ has joined #qi-hardware
kyak_ has quit [Changing host]
kyak_ has joined #qi-hardware
zear has joined #qi-hardware
kyak has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]
mth_ has joined #qi-hardware
sb0_ has joined #qi-hardware
sb0 has quit [*.net *.split]
FDCX has quit [*.net *.split]
qi-bot has quit [*.net *.split]
zear has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
zear has joined #qi-hardware
valhalla_ has joined #qi-hardware
qi-bot has joined #qi-hardware
dandon_ has joined #qi-hardware
dandon has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]
jbenedetto has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]
dandon_ is now known as dandon
valhalla has quit [*.net *.split]
mth has quit [*.net *.split]
Luke-Jr has quit [*.net *.split]
jbenedetto has joined #qi-hardware
dandon_ has joined #qi-hardware
wpwrak has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
tumdedum has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
dandon has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
dandon_ is now known as dandon
valhalla_ has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
woakas1 has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]
Ornotermes has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]
sb0_ has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]
rozzin has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]
wpwrak has joined #qi-hardware
Ornotermes has joined #qi-hardware
sb0 has joined #qi-hardware
tumdedum has joined #qi-hardware
jbenedetto has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
jbenedetto has joined #qi-hardware
mth_ is now known as mth
tumdedum has quit [Changing host]
tumdedum has joined #qi-hardware
tumdedum has quit [Max SendQ exceeded]
tumdedum has joined #qi-hardware
Luke-Jr has joined #qi-hardware
Luke-Jr is now known as Guest85934
woakas1 has joined #qi-hardware
valhalla has joined #qi-hardware